The Comprehensive Business Income Tax System: A Proposal for the Ultimate Neutrality Between Debt and New Equity Issues?
Abstract
The majority of experts agree that taxes are distortionary in nature. This is relatively true for all of the different groups of taxes, but for the corporate taxes is exceptionally obvious. The existence of corporate taxes can affect the company’s behavior in a number of ways and one of them is the distortion of choice of the sources of finance. As it is known, companies usually face 2 different financial alternatives to cover their investment opportunities: debt and equity (new equity issues or alternatively, retained earnings). According to the principles of corporate taxation, since interest payments are in fact tax deductible from the corporate income tax base, the debt source of finance is commonly considered as tax preferred as compared to the equity source of finance. Similarly, retained earnings are more preferred to new equities since capital gains are usually taxed upon realization or eventually exempted from taxation when reinvested. The theory suggests many varieties of corporate tax systems that sustain relative capacities to offset the excessive burden on the external equity supported investments and thus, eliminate the debt-equity related distortions. From the wider literature offer, we chose to examine the comprehensive business income tax system (CBIT), a proposal of the US Treasury Department and compare it with the basic “classical” approach in corporate taxation. The intention is to explore its properties from the view of neutrality and the allocation criteria, for which purpose the basic methodology of EMTR is additionally modified and extended. We hope to prove that this corporate system has justified its reputation in the sphere of our interest.
Downloads
References
Devereux M P, Griffith R. The taxation of discrete investment choices, The institute of fiscal studies, Warwick University, 1999;
Devereux M P, Griffith R, Klemm A. Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition, Economic Policy publications, no. 35, 2002;
Devereux, M P, Griffith R. Evaluating tax policy for location decisions, International Tax and Public Finance, 2003;
Harberger A C. The Incidence of the corporation income tax, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago press, 1962, 215-240;
Kari S, Yla-Liedenpohja J. Classical corporation tax as a global means of tax harmonization, CESifo working paper, Munich, 2002, p1;
Devereux M P, Griffith R. The taxation of discrete investment choices, The institute of fiscal studies, Warwick University, 1999, p49;
Gruevski I. Corporate taxes and their potential effects on investments, Economic Development, Skopje, 2013, p154;
Department of the U.S. Treasury. Integration of the individual and corporate tax systems, Taxing business income once, Washington D.C., 1992;
Brys B, Heady C. Fundamental reform of corporate income tax in OECD countries. A tax policy study, Paris, 2007, p21;
OECD. Fundamental corporate tax reform, A tax policy study, Paris, 2007, p89;
Brys B, Heady C. Fundamental reform of corporate income tax in OECD countries. A tax policy study, Paris, 2007, p22;
Brys B, Heady C. Fundamental reform of corporate income tax in OECD countries. A tax policy study, Paris, 2007, p22;
Brys B, Heady C. Fundamental reform of corporate income tax in OECD countries. A tax policy study, Paris, 2007;
Corporate Income Tax Code of the RM;
Institute for Fiscal Studies. Equity for companies: a corporation tax for the 1990s, Fourth report of the IFS Capital Taxes Group, London, 1991;
Leibfritz W, Thornton J, Bibbie A. Taxation and economic performance, An OECD study, 1997;
Ministry of finance of the RM;
OECD. Recent tax policy trends and reforms in OECD countries, A tax policy study, Paris, 2004;
Personal Income Tax Code of the RM.
