Analysis of the trade relations between the countries being part of the open Balkan initiative
Abstract
This paper's objective is to identify the sectors in which the Republic of North Macedonia has a comparative advantage regarding its export to other countries that are part of the Open Balkan initiative. The revealed comparative advantage of the Republic of North Macedonia in relation to the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Albania was calculated for the time period of 2011-2020 by having used the Standard International Trade Classification, Revision 4 (SITC, Revision 4). The quantitative methods that were used during the research are the following: the Index of Trade Openness (ITO), the Trade Balance Index (TBI), and the export index of Revealed Comparative Advantage (Balassa’s RCA). The results of the research point to the fact that regarding the case of the Republic of North Macedonia, a high index of trade openness was registered in comparison to the other countries being part of the Open Balkan initiative. Furthermore, the Trade Balance Index shows that in the course of the analyzed period, the Republic of North Macedonia had been continuously present in the capacity of a net exporter of products of the category of tobacco and beverages, whereas the RCA index indicates positive values in the category of the food sector, beverages and tobacco, crude materials, except fuels as well as animal and vegetable oils, fats and waxes.
Downloads
References
2 Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. 33(2), pp.99-123
3 Bowen, H. (1983). On the theoretical interpretation of indices of trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage. Review of World Economics. 119(3), pp. 464-472
4 Ballance, R., Forstner, H. & Murray, T. (1987). Consistency tests of alternative measures of comparative advantage. Review of Economics & Statistics. 69(1), pp. 157-161.
5 Vollrath, T. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 127(2), pp. 265-280.
6 Dalum, B., Laursen, K. & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and ‘stickiness. International Review of Applied Economic. 12(3), pp.423-443.
7 Proudman, J. & Redding, S. (1998). Openness and growth. The Bank of England.
8 Laursen, K. (2000). Specialization, Trade and Growth, Routhledge.
9 Yu, R., Junning, C. & Leung, P.S. (2009). The normalized revealed comparative advantage index. Annals of Regional Science. 43(1), pp. 267-282.
10 Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Bus Rev. 5(1), pp.99-115.
11 Yeats, A. (1985). On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv.121(1), pp. 61-73
12 Widodo, T. (2009). Comparative Advantage: theory, empirical measures and case studies. Review of Economic and Business Studies. 4, pp. 57-82.
13 Lafay, G. (1992). The Measurement of Revealed Comparative Advantages, in M.G. Dagenais and P.A. Muet (eds.), International Trade Modeling, Chapman & Hill, London.
14 Department for Business Innovation & Skills, BIS Performance Indicators (2013). [Online]. Available from: www.gov.uk/bis [Accessed: 8 November 2022]
15 Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Bus Rev. 5(1), pp.99-115.
