Municipal Fiscal Capacity in North Macedonia

  • Ilija Gruevski
  • Stevan Gaber
Keywords: Fiscal capacity, intergovernment transfers, fiscal disparity, fiscal equalization, own revenues.

Abstract

The topic of fiscal capacity in Macedonian municipalites have become one of the essential aspects of local fiscal policy within the upcoming and curently stalled proces of fiscal decentralziation in N. Macedonia. It procures arguments that could enable independent and effiecent process in collection of own revenues. The size of fiscal capacity would help significantly in creating efficient tax and budget policy in central and local government. It could also help in achieving larger independence from the central government, but also would help to achieve equallization in some financialy endangered municipalities. Therefore, the fiscal capacity sugests that the tax collection is determined from tax capacity and capacity of the administration. Differences that apear in the colected own revenues are the reason for fiscal disparity. Fundamental part of the paper is the intention to determine the main methods of estimating fiscal capaciy and to measure the potenial fiscal disparity between some of the macedonian communities. It considers the potential revenues of the municipality obtained under the curent tax base with average tax effort. It is essential that the municipality controls those sources of revenue, such as the own revenues, common taxes and earmarked conditional transfers. Statistical data sugest that the discrepancies in fiscal capacity or collected real estate tax and development fee are predetermined from the differences arising from municipal tax base and the fiscal effort. Those variations are significant between urban, rural and city of Skopje. General transfers from the central government, especialy VAT subsidies, can achieve to some extent equalization in the revenue discrepancies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Oates, W.E. 1990. „Decentralization of the Public Sector: An Overview“, in R. Bennet (ed.), Decentralization, Local Governments, and Markets, Oxford University Press.
2. Gramlich, E.M. and H. Galper. 1973. „State and Local Fiscal Behavior and Federal Grant Policy“, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
3. Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–24.
4. Atanasovski, Z. 2005. „Javni finansii“. Ekonomski fakultet, Skopje.
5. Gaber, S. and Gruevski, I. 2022. “Javni finansii”. Goce Delcev University, Stip.
6. Musharraf, R.C., J. Martinez-Vazquez, A. Timofeev. 2012. „Fiscal Decentralization for Local Development: An Integral Study“. International Center for Public Policy, Atlanta, USA.
7. UNDP.2012.„Fiscal Decentralization for Local Development: An Integral Study“.
8. Bergvall, D., C. Charbit, D. Kraan, and O. Merk. 2006. “Intergovernmental Transfers and Decentralised Public Spending”. OECD Journal on Budegeting.
9. Wu, Min, Chang Liu, and Ziying Fan. 2019. “Intergovernmental Transfers and the Expansion of Subnational Government Expenditure: An Empirical Explanation based on China’s Budgetary System.” Journal of Financial Research 465 (3): 74–91.
10. Mao, Jie, Dehua Wang, and Chong-En Bai. 2011. “Intergovernmental Transfers for Ethnic Regions, Public Spending Difference and Economic Development Gap.” Economic Research Journal (S2): 75–87
11. Dahlby, B. and Ferede, E. 2016. “The stimulative effect of intergovernmental grants and the marginal cost of public funds”. International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 23(1), pages 114-139.
12. Dahlberg, M. and E. Johansson. 1999. “On the Vote Purchasing Behaviour of Incumbent Governments”. Working Papers from Uppsala University, Sweden.
13. Johansson, E. 2003. ”Intergovernmental Grants as a Tactical Instrument: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Municipalities”. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 87.
14. Gruevski, I. and S. Gaber. 2023. „Osnovi na lokalni finansii“. Goce Delcev University, Stip. 15. Gaber, S. and Gruevski, I. (2020). Property Taxation in North Macedonia. Journal of Economics, 5 (2). pp. 11-19.
16. Cyan, M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Timofeev, A. 2009. Final Report Financing Equitable service delivery for all citizens. Skopje. UNDP.
17. Mieszkowski, P.and R. A. Musgrave (1999). “Federalism, grants, and fiscal equalization”. National Tax Journal, 52:2, pp. 239-60.
Published
2023-11-23
Section
Banking and Finance