Implementation of IFRS 16 and Its Effect on  Earnings Management

Spase  Dameski; Olivera  Gjorgieva-Trajkovska

doi:10.46763/JOE2510143d

Spase Dameski
Olivera Gjorgieva-Trajkovska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46763/JOE2510143d

Keywords: IFRS 16, Earnings Management, Lease Accounting, Financial Reporting, Transparency

Abstract

The adoption of IFRS 16 – Leases has introduced significant changes to financial reporting by requiring companies to recognize lease liabilities on their balance sheets. This shift has potential implications for earnings management practices, as companies may adjust financial reporting strategies in response to the new standard. This study explores the possible effects of IFRS 16 on earnings management, focusing on areas such as income smoothing, financial
ratios, and managerial discretion. While IFRS 16 aims to enhance transparency and reduce off-balance-sheet financing, its actual impact on earnings management remains a subject of discussion. By analyzing financial data before and after IFRS 16 implementation, this research seeks to understand whether firms have altered their reporting behavior in response to the standard. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on financial reporting quality, regulatory effectiveness, and managerial incentives under IFRS 16.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Barone, E., Birt, J., & Moya, S. (2014). Lease accounting: A review of recent literature. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), 35–54.
2. Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36.
3. Blankley, A. I., Duru, A., & Vermeer, T. E. (2022). IFRS 16 adoption and changes in financial metrics: Evidence from airlines. Journal of International Accounting Research, 21(3), 25–47.
4. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
5. Deloitte. (2019). The impact of IFRS 16 on corporate real estate: A focus on retail companies. Deloitte Real Estate Advisory Report.
6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
7. Fitó, M. Á., Moya, S., & Orgaz, N. (2013). Considering the effects of operating lease capitalization on key financial ratios: A Spanish perspective. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 42(159), 341–369.
8. IASB. (2016). IFRS 16 – Leases. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
9. Imhoff, E. A. Jr., Lipe, R. C., & Wright, D. W. (1991). Operating leases: Impact of constructive capitalization. Accounting Horizons, 5(1), 51–63.
10. Imhoff, E. A. Jr., Lipe, R. C., & Wright, D. W. (1997). Operating leases: Income effects of constructive capitalization. Accounting Horizons, 11(1), 12–32.
11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
12. KPMG. (2020). Analysis of the effect of the implementation of IFRS 16 leases on the financial ratios of retail companies listed on the JSE. In R. Le Roux (Ed.), North-West University Dissertation.
13. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
14. Xu, S., Shao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). The economic consequences of IFRS 16 adoption: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100760.