AIR POLLUTION IN SKOPJE: PRACTICE AND AWARENESS IN THE SCOPE OF HOUSEHOLD HEATING
Abstract
Air pollution is a concern which poses threat to human health and likewise greatly impacts the ecosystem and the environment. By its broader definition, the air pollution is described as increase in the rate of harmful gases and particles in the atmosphere.
Given that the city of Skopje is on the top of the list of most polluted cities in Europe the aim of this study is to analyze the air pollution in Skopje, particularly focusing the attention on the household heating as one of the major sources of ambient air pollution in the city.
A survey on 242 households was conducted in order to obtain information about the ways of residential heating and the willingness of households to use more environmentally friendly heating technologies. The survey was carried out on the territory of the city of Skopje, as it is the most polluted city in the country. The governmental measures for air pollution abatement in Skopje were reviewed as well.
The results show that most of the households although aware about the emission of harmful particles into air when combusting firewood in old traditional stoves, they still use firewood as it is the cheapest mode of heating. The previous is of particular importance and decisive for the low-income households. It was also observed that the respondents were familiar with the possibility for using wood pellets, as more environmentally heating mode, but there was a lack of information concerning the possibility of governmental subsidizing for replacement of the existing firewood with more modern wood pellets system.
The households that have already started to use wood pellets instead firewood, have increased monthly costs (10 - 15%), but nevertheless they still recommend the use of pellets and pellet stoves due to the efficiency of heating, maintenance, cleanliness, and less pollution of air on the long run.
Summarizing, the choice of heating with firewood is more due to the lower monthly incomes and rational cost planning of the households, and less to the lack of awareness of citizens for utilizing more efficient and more environmentally friendly heating technologies.
References
2. Finnish Meteorological Institute; Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, 2016, Air quality improvement plan for Skopje agglomeration, EU project. Available at https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/activity_3.2_benchmark_3.2.1_skopje_air_quality_improvement_plan.pdf
3. Martinez, G. S., Spadaro, J. V., Chapizanis, D., Kendrovski, V., Kochubovski, M., Mudu, P. (2018). Health Impacts and Economic Costs of Air Pollution in the Metropolitan Area of Skopje. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (626), 1-11.doi:10.3390/ijerph15040626
4. Mentes, D., Kovacs, H., Nagy, G., Csaba, P. (2019). Investigation of air pollutants from residential heating. Materials Science and Engineering, 44(2), 44-66, doi: 10.32974.mse.2019.006
5. Meisner, C., Gjorgjev, D., Tozija, F. (2015). Estimating health impacts and economic costs of air pollution in the Republic
of Macedonia. SEEJPH 2015. doi 10.12908/SEEJPH-2014-45
6. Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning (2019). The quality of the environment in the Republic of North Macedonia — Annual report for 2018.
7. Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning (2022). The quality of the environment in the Republic of North Macedonia — Annual report for 2021.
8. OECD (2019). The economic cost of air pollution: evidence from
Europe.ECO/WKP(2019)54. Available at: https://one.oecd.org/document/ECO/WKP(2019)54/En/pdf
9. Spirova, S., Vasiljevic-Shikaleska, A. (2021). Residential heating with wood and wood pellets: life cycle cost analysis and air quality impacts. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(27), 15-24. Available at: http://www.fbe.edu.mk/images/stories/S.Spirova_vol.11_iss27.pdf
10. Schmidl C., Luisser, M., Padouvas, E., Lasselsberger, L., Rzaca, M., Ramirez-Santa Cruz, C., Handler, M., Peng, G., Bauer, H., Puxbaum, H. (2011). Particulate and gaseous emissions from manually and automatically fired small scale combustion systems. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 7443-7454.
11. State statistical office (2021). Environmental statistics
12. State Statistical Office of the Republic of North Macedonia (2021). Statistical Atlas, Census 2021
13. State statistical office (2014). Energy consumption in households.
14. State statistical office (2019). Energy consumption in households.
15. Suman M., Parihar, P., Ravindra, K. (2022). Community perception about air pollution, willingness to pay and awareness about health risks in Chandigarh, India. Environmental Challenges, 9, 100656, 1-11.
16. Viana, M., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Guerreiro, C., Vogt, M., Colette, A., Collet, S., Albinet, A., Fraboulet, I., Lacome, J. M., Tognet, F., De Leeuw, F. 2016, Contribution of residential combustion to ambient air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2015/1, European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301620388_Contribution_of_residential_combustion_to_ambient_air_pollution_and_greenhouse_gas_emissions#fullTextFileContent
17. WHO & OECD (2015). Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe: Clean air, health and wealth. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/276772/Economic-cost-health-impact-air-pollution-en.pdf
18. WHO (2016). Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. Technical Report 2016.
19. World Bank (2022). The Global Health Cost of PM2.5 Air Pollution: A Case for Action Beyond 2021. International Development in Focus. Washington, DC: World Bank.
doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1816-5. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO
20. World Bank & Institutе of public health – Skopje & Medical Faculty – Skopje (2015). Estimating health impacts and economic costs of air pollution in the Republic of Macedonia
21. World Health Organization, European Union & Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2015). Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe.
22. https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/health-impacts-of-air-pollution
23. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2022/health-impacts-of-air-pollution
24. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/36501/9781464818165.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
25. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2021/air-quality-status-briefing-2021
