APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
Abstract
The ne bis in idem principle is included in many national, European and
international legal instruments. This principle is part of the European
Union’s area of Freedom, Security and Justice. It is included in the main
EU legal sources, such as, Articles 54 to 58 of the Convention
Implementing the Schengen Agreement (“CISA”), and Article 50 of the
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“Charter”). The
Court of Justice of EU in its case law (see inter alia Gözütok and Brügge,
Gasparini) has stated that the objective of the ne bis in idem principle is
to ensure that no one is prosecuted for the same acts in several Member
States on account of the fact that he exercises his right to freedom of
movement. The principle is also included in a large number of EU
instruments on judicial cooperation in criminal matters, including mutual
recognition instruments, such as, the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA
on the European Arrest Warrant (“FD EAW”) and the Directive
2014/41/EU on the European investigation Order in criminal matters.
Moreover, the ne bis in idem principle is included in Article 4 of Protocol
7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. The authors analyze the
practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, paralleling the
scope of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. On the
basis of the achieved standards, which have been developed by the
practice of these courts, the authors see the implications for the
application of this principle in Serbian judicial practice.