RESPONDING TO MASS ATROCITIES: TRACING THE ORIGINS AND REFLECTINGON THE EVOLVING ROLES OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ANDINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/SCGW25112y139rAbstract
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) share a common moral foundation rooted in the post-WWII human rights agenda. They constitute the response of the international community to mass atrocities around the world. R2P, as a political and normative framework, seeks to ensure that states uphold their duty to protect populations from genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and ethnic cleaning, and the ICC as an independent judicial mechanism, aims to prosecute and try those individuals alleged to have committed mass atrocity crimes. This paper traces the historical foundations of both frameworks, shared objectives and conceptual complementarities that underpin their roles in atrocity prevention and response. It also explores the tensions that have emerged in their interaction, particularly in the face of political realities, issues of sovereignty and challenges of contested implementation. It further analyzes how the functions and relevance of R2P and ICC have evolved over time, how they have affected the response to more recent conflicts and how these developments have influenced their overall effectiveness. By situating R2P and the ICC within the broader architecture of atrocity prevention and accountability, the paper aims to offer a nuanced understanding of their interplay and propose pathways for enhancing their coherence and impact in the face of ongoing and future mass atrocities.
Keywords: Responsibility to Protect, International Criminal Court, Prevention, Accountability, Atrocity Crimes, Justice, Peace
Downloads
References
Johnson, S. W., & Hinderaker, J. H. (2002). Guidelines for cross-examination: The cross-examination
of Hermann Goering. Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 59(October), 22.
Gordon, G. S. (2012). The trial of Peter Von Hagenbach: Reconciling history, historiography, and
international criminal law. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2006370
Liivoja, R. (2013). Competing histories: Soviet war crimes in the Baltic States. ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299783415_Competing_Histories_Soviet_War_Cri
mes_in_the_Baltic_States
Human Rights Watch. (1991). Human Rights Watch World Report 1990 - China. United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees.
https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/hrw/1991/en/94437
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian. (n.d.). Tiananmen Square, 1989. U.S. Department of
State. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1989-1992/tiananmen-square
Williamson, C. (2007). The role of the United States in international criminal justice. Penn State
International Law Review, 25(4), Article 7. http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol25/iss4/7
Kaufman, Z. D. (2009). The United States' role in the establishment of the United Nations International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. In P. Clark & Z. D. Kaufman (Eds.), After genocide:
Transitional justice, post-conflict reconstruction, and reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond
(pp. 229–260). Columbia University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1916775
Secretary-General, & Annan, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the international rule of law in maintaining
international peace and security. United Nations.
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2024). What is R2P? https://www.globalr2p.org/what-
is-r2p/
Bassiouni, M. C. (1998). The statute of the International Criminal Court. Transnational Publishers.
International Criminal Court. (n.d.). Understanding the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-
cpi.int/sites/default/files/iccdocs/PIDS/docs/UICCGeneralENG.pdf
United Nations. (1998–1999). Establishment of an International Criminal Court—Overview.
https://legal.un.org/icc/general/overview.htm
Washburn, J. (1999). The negotiation of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court and
international lawmaking in the 21st century. Pace International Law Review, 11(2), 361.
https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3536.1238
Bassiouni, M. C., & Schabas, W. A. (2016). The legislative history of the International Criminal Court
(Vol. 9). Brill-Nijhoff.
United Nations General Assembly. (1995). G.A. Res. 50/46, U.N. Doc. A/RES/50/46.
Zimmermann, A. (1998). The creation of a permanent International Criminal Court.
https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf2/mpunyb_zimmermann_2.pdf
United Nations. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Britannica. (n.d.). Rwanda genocide of 1994. https://www.britannica.com/event/Rwanda-genocide-of-
1994
Dayal, A. (2018, October). Beyond ‘do something’: Revisiting the international community’s role in
the Rwandan genocide. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2018/10/beyond-do-
something-revisiting-the-international-communitys-role-in-the-rwandan-genocide/
Prunier, G. (1995). Somalia: Civil war, intervention and withdrawal 1990–1995. WRITENET.
https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/writenet/1995/en/54273
United Nations Security Council. (1992). Resolution 733 (S/RES/733).
United Nations Security Council. (1992). Resolution 775 (S/RES/775).
European Court of Human Rights. (n.d.). Mustafić-Mujić and Others v. the Netherlands (Application
No. 49037/15).
European Court of Human Rights. (n.d.). Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands
(Application No. 65542/12).
Deutsche Welle. (2019). Netherlands partially responsible for Srebrenica massacre, court rules.
https://www.dw.com/en/netherlands-partially-responsible-for-srebrenica-massacre-court-
rules/a-49646038
Dannenbaum, T. (2019). A disappointing end of the road for the Mothers of Srebrenica litigation in the
Netherlands. European Journal of International Law: EJIL: Talk!. https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-
disappointing-end-of-the-road-for-the-mothers-of-srebrenica-litigation-in-the-netherlands/
Australian Red Cross. (2011). International humanitarian law and the responsibility to protect
handbook. https://www.redcross.org.au/globalassets/cms-assets/documents/about-us/ihl-r2p-
responsibility-to-protect.pdf
United Nations. (n.d.). About the responsibility to protect. https://www.un.org/en/genocide-
prevention/responsibility-protect/about
International Criminal Court. (2006). ICC – First arrest for the International Criminal Court.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-first-arrest-international-criminal-court
International Criminal Court. (2025). Darfur, Sudan. https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur
International Criminal Court. (2025). Ongwen case: The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (ICC-02/04-
01/15). https://www.icc-cpi.int/uganda/ongwen
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025). Conflict in Syria. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/conflict-syria
International Criminal Court. (2025). Cases. https://www.icc-
cpi.int/cases?f%5B0%5D=accused_states_cases%3A358
International Criminal Court. (n.d.). The Prosecutor v. Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (ICC-02/05-
01/20).
International Criminal Court. (2025). Investigations. https://www.icc-cpi.int
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025a). Civil conflict in Libya. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/civil-war-libya
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025b). Israeli–Palestinian conflict. https://www.cfr.org/global-
conflict-tracker/conflict/israeli-palestinian-conflict
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025c). Conflict in the Central African Republic.
https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violence-central-african-republic
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025d). Civil war in Sudan. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/power-struggle-sudan
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025e). Instability in Afghanistan. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/war-afghanistan
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025f). Venezuela crisis. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/instability-venezuela
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025g). War in Ukraine. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025h). Civil war in Myanmar. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-
tracker/conflict/rohingya-crisis-myanmar
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. (2025). About the ICTY.
Scharf, M. (2008). Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. United Nations Office
of Legal Affairs. https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/ictr/ictr_e.pdf
United Nations. (2019). International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals – The cases.
https://unictr.irmct.org/en/cases
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. (2023). Key figures of the cases.
https://www.icty.org/en/cases/key-figures-cases
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025). Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violence-democratic-republic-congo
Erol, A. (2023, August 25). The International Criminal Court: The effectiveness vs criticisms. Istanbul
Center for International Law. https://icil.org.tr/the-international-criminal-court-the-
effectiveness-vs-criticisms/
Kuttab, J. (2023, September 12). The International Criminal Court’s failure to hold Israel accountable.
Arab Center Washington DC. https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/the-international-criminal-
courts-failure-to-hold-israel-accountable/
Baker, A. (2019, November 18). The failure of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Jerusalem
Center for Security and Foreign Affairs. https://jcpa.org/article/the-failure-of-the-international-
criminal-court-icc/
Song, S.-H. (2018, July 17). Past achievements and future challenges of the ICC. International Criminal
Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/itemsDocuments/20a-ceremony/20180717-
sang-speech.pdf
Evans, G. (2020, November 26). R2P: The dream and the reality. Global Centre for the Responsibility
to Protect. https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/r2p-the-dream-and-the-reality/
Gholiagha, S. (2013, September 7). From Kosovo to Syria – Why R2P is of no use if the UN Security
Council is unable to act together. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/from-kosovo-to-
syria-why-r2p-is-of-no-use-if-the-un-security-council-is-unable-to-act-together/
Council on Foreign Relations. (2023, April 20). The rise and fall of the Responsibility to Protect.
https://education.cfr.org/learn/timeline/rise-and-fall-responsibility-protect
Ralph, J. (2015). Symposium: International criminal justice and the Responsibility to Protect. Criminal
Law Forum, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-015-9255-0
Rummel, R. J. (1997). Statistics of democide. Center for National Security Law, School of Law,
University of Virginia; Transaction Publishers.
