ADEQUACY DECISIONS UNDER THE GDPR AND ACCESS TO EU DATA: LIMITS FOR THIRD COUNTRIES IN THE AGE OF AI

Авторы

  • Oksana Panichkovska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46763/

Ключевые слова:

Adequacy Decisions, Data Transfers, GDPR, Artificial Intelligence, Third Countries

Аннотация

Cross-border data transfers have become a central element of the global digital economy, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence, which relies on access to large and diverse datasets. Within the European Union, such transfers are regulated under the General Data Protection Regulation, which permits transfers to third countries primarily on the basis of adequacy decisions under Article 45. This paper examines the role of adequacy decisions as a mechanism for enabling access to EU personal data and analyses the challenges faced by third countries in meeting the required standard of protection. It focuses on the concept of “essential equivalence” and the legal and institutional conditions that must be fulfilled in order to obtain adequacy status. The paper adopts a doctrinal approach, based on the analysis of EU legal sources and relevant case law, and situates these findings within the broader context of global data flows. It argues that the adequacy framework sets a high and complex threshold, which is difficult to meet in practice, particularly for countries with developing regulatory systems. In the context of AI development, this may limit access to data and affect the ability of third countries to participate in data-driven innovation, thereby influencing the structure of global data flows.

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Библиографические ссылки

Anderson, B., & Sutherland, E. (2024). Collective action for responsible AI in health. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 10. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f2050177-en

Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001

Bradford, A. (2023). Digital empires: The global battle to regulate technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197649268.001.0001

Czerniawski, M. (2024). Shrouded in secrecy – does the comitology procedure for GDPR adequacy decisions fit its purpose? Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 18(2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2024-2-3

Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Ltd & Schrems, Case C-311/18, EU:C:2020:559 (2020).

De Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The new General Data Protection Regulation: Still a sound system for the protection of individuals?

Computer Law & Security Review, 32(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.02.006

European Commission. (2019). Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Official Journal of the European Union, L 76, 1–58. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2019/419/oj

European Commission. (2021). Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1772 of 28 June 2021 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom. Official Journal of the European Union, L 360, 1–68. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2021/1772/oj

European Commission. (2023). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the first review of the functioning of the adequacy decision for Japan (COM(2023) 275 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52023DC0275

European Commission. (2025). Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2574 of 19 December 2025 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1772 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom. Official Journal of the European Union, 2025/2574. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2025/2574/oj

European Data Protection Board. (2021). Recommendations 01/2020 on measures that supplement transfer tools to ensure compliance with the EU level of protection of personal data. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/recommendations/recommendations-012020-measures-supplement-transfer_en

European Data Protection Board. (2023). Guidelines 05/2021 on the interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provisions on international transfers as per Chapter V of the GDPR (Version 2.0). https://www.edpb.europa.eu/documents/guideline/guidelines-052021-on-the-interplay-between-the-application-of-article-3-and-the_en

European Data Protection Board. (2024). Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI models. https://www.edpb.europa.eu/documents/opinion-of-the-board-art-64/opinion-282024-on-certain-data-protection-aspects-related-to_en?

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2019). Facial recognition technology: Fundamental rights considerations in the context of law enforcement. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2019/facial-recognition-technology-fundamental-rights-considerations-context-law

Hallinan, D. (2024). The concept of international health research adequacy decisions. International Data Privacy Law, 14(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipae019

Kuner, C. (2013). Transborder data flows and data privacy law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674619.001.0001

Kuru, T. (2024). Lawfulness of the mass processing of publicly accessible online data to train large language models. International Data Privacy Law, 14(4), 326–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipae013

Lynskey, O. (2015). The foundations of EU data protection law. Oxford University Press.

Malgieri, G. (2022). Automated decision-making and data protection in Europe. In G. González Fuster, R. Van Brakel, & P. De Hert (Eds.), Research handbook on privacy and data protection law (pp. 433–448). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438515.00028

Marelli, M. (2024). Transferring personal data to international organizations under the GDPR: An analysis of the transfer mechanisms. International Data Privacy Law, 14(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad022

Mc Cullagh, K. (2025). EU adequacy assessments: Evolving criteria, political tensions, and the push for a global data standard. Common Market Law Review, 62(3), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2025045

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). (2024). Official Journal of the European Union, 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, Case C-362/14, EU:C:2015:650 2015

Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402

Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2019). A right to reasonable inferences: Re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Columbia Business Law Review, 2019(2), 494–620. https://doi.org/10.7916/cblr.v2019i2.3424

Опубликован

2026-10-06

Как цитировать

ADEQUACY DECISIONS UNDER THE GDPR AND ACCESS TO EU DATA: LIMITS FOR THIRD COUNTRIES IN THE AGE OF AI. (2026). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Social Changes in the Global World", 13(13). https://doi.org/10.46763/