ABUSE OF SELF-DEFENCE UNDER ARTICLE 51 OF THE UN CHARTER: LEGAL BOUNDARIES AND GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES

Authors

  • Paweł Natorski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46763/

Keywords:

right to self-defence, abuse of international law, global social changes, collective security, use of force

Abstract

The right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter constitutes one of the fundamental norms of public international law. However, in recent decades its interpretation and application have increasingly been subject to abuse by states seeking to legitimise the use of force. This paper analyses selected cases of such abuse (e.g. military actions of the United States, Russia’s actions in Ukraine since 2014/2022, and selected operations in the Middle East) and argues that the misuse of self-defence not only undermines the prohibition of the use of force (Art. 2(4) UN Charter), but may also contribute to broader social changes on a global scale. Beyond legal implications, the paper explores the broader social consequences that may arise from such developments, including mass forced migrations, delegitimisation of international law, erosion of trust in global institutions, societal polarisation, and the shift from “security through law” to “security through force.” It argues that these developments may contribute to a feedback loop between legal erosion and social processes. The paper argues that the ongoing broadening of Article 51 contributes to the fragmentation of the post-1945 international order. It concludes with de lege ferenda considerations aimed at reinforcing procedural and substantive safeguards to preserve the balance embedded in the UN Charter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions

Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, 2005 I.C.J. 168 (Dec. 19).

Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, 1986 I.C.J. 14 (June 27).

Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory, Advisory Opinion, 2004 I.C.J. 136 (July 9).

Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht). (2019, September 17). Order of the Second Senate – 2 BvE 2/16. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2019/09/es20190917_2bve000216.html.

Legal documents and reports

Chatham House. (2005). Principles of international law on the use of force by states in self-defence. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2005/10/principles-international-law-use-force-states-self-defence.

France. (2015, September 8). Identical letters dated 8 September 2015 from the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council (UN Doc. S/2015/745). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/804867?v=pdf.

Ministère des Armées. (2019). French position on international law applied to cyberspace. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/French-position-on-international-law-applied-to-cyberspace.pdf.

United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations.

United Nations General Assembly. (2022, March 2). Aggression against Ukraine (A/RES/ES-11/1). United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3965290?v=pdf.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2024). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2023. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends.

United Nations Security Council. (2001, September 12). Security Council resolution 1368 (2001) [Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts] (UN Doc. S/RES/1368(2001)). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/448051.

United Nations Security Council. (2014, September 23). Letter dated 23 September 2014 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (UN Doc. S/2014/695). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/779957?v=pdf.

United Nations, Special Committee on the Charter of the United Nations and on the Strengthening of the Role of the Organization. (2025). Identification of new subjects: Further revised version of the working paper submitted by Mexico (UN Doc. A/AC.182/L.168). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4076206.

U.S. Department of State. (2002). U.S. National Security Strategy: Prevent our enemies from threatening us, our allies, and our friends with weapons of mass destruction. U.S. Department of State. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/wh/15425.htm

Books

Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s principles of public international law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Franck, T. M. (2002). Recourse to force: State action against threats and armed attacks. Cambridge University Press.

Kelsen, H. (1950). The law of the United Nations. Stevens & Sons.

Mudde, C. (2019). The far right today. Polity Press.

Posner, E.A., Vermeuele, A. (2011). The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic. Oxford University Press.

Shaw, M. N. (2011). Prawo międzynarodowe (J. J. Gojło et al., Trans.). Książka i Wiedza.

Chapters in books

Hilpold, P. (2016). The applicability of Article 51 UN Charter to asymmetric wars. In H.-J. Heintze & P. Thielbörger (Eds.), From cold war to cyber war: The evolution of the international law of peace and armed conflict over the last 25 years, 127-135. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19087-7_9.

Ratner, S. R. (2013). Self-defence against terrorists: The meaning of armed attack. In N. Schrijver & L. van den Herik (Eds.), Counter-terrorism strategies in a fragmented international legal order: Meeting the challenges, pp. 334-351. Cambridge University Press.

Reviews Stemmet, A. (2013). ’Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter : Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice, Tom Ruys. South African Yearbook of International Law, 38, 297–302. Retrieved from https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/SAYIL/article/view/8281.

Scientific articles

Brands, H., & Feaver, P. (2017). Was the Rise of ISIS Inevitable? Survival, 59(3), 7–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1325595.

Elmohtadybellah, A. (2026). Iran’s strike on U.S. forces in Qatar: Self-defence or aggression? A doctrinal appraisal under the UN charter and the Rome statute. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 13(1), 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2026.2643543

Garwood-Gowers, A. (2004). Pre-emptive self-defence: A necessary development or the road to international anarchy? The Australian Year Book of International Law Online, 23(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229-023-01-900000004.

Halberstam, M. (1996). The right to self-defence once the Security Council takes action. Michigan Journal of International Law, 17(2), 229–248.

Léonard, S. & Kaunert, C. (2022). The securitisation of migration in the European Union: Frontex and its evolving security practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(6), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851469.

Shiryaev, Y. (2008). The right of armed self-defence in international law and self-defence arguments used in the Second Lebanon War. Acta Societatis Martensis, 3, 80-97.

Van der Steenhoven, R. (2019). Conduct and subsequent practice by states in the application of the requirement to report under UN Charter Article 51. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 6(2), 242-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2019.1690333.

Zhang, S. (2022). Rise of China and its behaviours in the South China Sea: An analysis of defensive realism perspective. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 6(1), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/6.1.18.

Other sources

Bagheri, S. (2017, December 22). Self-defense against the PKK? The Turkish approach to international law. Völkerrechtsblog. https://intrechtdok.de/pow-challenge?redirect_url=%2Fservlets%2FMCRFileNodeServlet%2Fmir_derivate_00002790%2FTurkish%2520Approach%2520-%2520revised.pdf.

Bennett, O. (2023). The United States’ flawed justifications for the intervention in Iran: Anticipatory self-defence and ad hoc collective self-defence. Bristol Law School Blog. https://blogs.uwe.ac.uk/bristol-law-school/the-united-states-flawed-justifications-for-the-intervention-in-iran-anticipatory-self-defence-and-ad-hoc-collective-self-defence/.

Cheney, R. B. (2004, February 16). Remarks by the Vice President Richard B. Cheney at a Bush-Cheney ’04 event in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The American Presidency Project.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-vice-president-bush-cheney-04-event-albuquerque-new-mexico.

Collins, E. (2015, October). Understanding the legality of Russia’s actions in Syria. Michigan Journal of International Law. https://www.mjilonline.org/understanding-the-legality-of-russias-actions-in-syria/.

D’Alessandra, F. (2026). Operation Epic Fury and the International Law on the Use of Force. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://assets.carnegieendowment.org/files/D'Alessandra_Legality%20Operation.pdf.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (2026, June 8). Iran Foreign Ministry statement on defensive strikes against Israeli regime targets. https://en.mfa.ir/portal/newsview/789277.

Schmitt, M. N. (2022, February 28). Russia’s “special military operation” and the (claimed) right of self-defence. Articles of War. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/russia-special-military-operation-claimed-right-self-defence/.

Schmitt, M. N. (2025, June 27). Interpreting the law of self-defence. Articles of War. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/interpreting-law-self-defence/.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Global trends. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends.

Wright, J. (2017, January 11). The modern law of self-defence [Speech]. UK Government. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-modern-law-of-self-defence/

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06

How to Cite

ABUSE OF SELF-DEFENCE UNDER ARTICLE 51 OF THE UN CHARTER: LEGAL BOUNDARIES AND GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES. (2026). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Social Changes in the Global World", 13(13). https://doi.org/10.46763/