THE DYNAMICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: A MULTI-FACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF THEORETICAL MODELS AND THE SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT OF NORTH MACEDONIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/Schlagwörter:
Domestic Violence, Socio-Ecological Model, Power and Control, Patriarchal Traditions, Gender InequalityAbstract
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the causes and
theoretical frameworks surrounding domestic violence, with a specific
focus on the socio-cultural context of North Macedonia. By moving
beyond outdated one-dimensional models that attribute violence solely
to social class or individual pathology, this study utilizes the multifactorial socio-ecological model to explore how individual, relational,
community, and societal factors intersect to perpetuate abuse. The
research evaluates several scientific theories - including social learning,
learned helplessness, and the psychopathological approach - while
critiquing the myths of "loss of control" and "reciprocal violence."
Central to this analysis is the Duluth "Power and Control Wheel," which
identifies violence as a deliberate pattern of behavior intended to
maintain dominance rather than an isolated outburst of anger. In the
context of North Macedonia, the paper examines how a prolonged
period of societal transition, economic fragility, and deeply rooted
patriarchal traditions contribute to the subordinate position of women.
The study concludes that domestic violence is an expression of
historically unequal power relations and argues that effective prevention
requires simultaneous intervention across all levels of the socialecological framework. By shifting the focus from victim behavior to the
perpetrator’s intent and the broader social climate, this paper advocates
for a systemic approach to fostering a culture of non-violence and
gender equality.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change.
Routledge.
Ganley, A. L., & Schechter, S. (1995). Domestic violence: A national curriculum for
family preservation practitioners. San Francisco: Edna McConnell Clark
Foundation; Michigan State Dept. of Social Services, Families First.
Klein, E., Smith, A., & Johnson, L. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing
public perceptions/halting the epidemic. SAGE Publications.
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002).
World report on violence and health. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241545615
Metaj-Stojanova, A. (2016). Identifying and defining the problem of domestic
violence. In Book of proceedings of the Third International Scientific
Conference "Social Changes in the Global World" (pp. 119-128). University
Goce Delchev, Stip, North Macedonia.
Metaj-Stojanova, A. (2017). A comparative view on the legal protection of family
home and the current situation in the Republic of North Macedonia. In
Proceedings of the 11th Annual South-East European Doctoral Student
Conference: Infusing Research and Knowledge in South-East Europe (pp.
109–119). South-East European Research Centre.
https://www.seerc.org/yrw/2017/files/DSC2017-Proceedings.pdf
Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights. (1998). Domestic violence in Macedonia.
Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights.
https://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org/Res/macedonia_2.PDF
Netkova, B., et al. (2007). Covekovite prava i semejnoto nasilstvo so osvrt vo
Republika Makedonija. Tetovo, North Macedonia.
Paymar, M. (1994). Building a coordinated community response to domestic
violence: An overview of the problem. Springer Publishing.
Pence, E. L. (1999). Some thoughts on philosophy. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence
(Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons
from the Duluth model (pp. 25-41). Springer Publishing.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth
model. Springer Publishing.
Sellers, C. S., Cochran, J. K., & Branch, K. A. (2005). Social learning theory and
partner violence: A research note. Deviant Behavior, 26(4), 379–395.
https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290931669
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict
Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(1), 75–88.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. Harper & Row.
Zorza, J. (Ed.). (2002). Violence against women. Civic Research Institute.
