POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY AND SUPERVISION IN THE REPUBLIC OFSLOVENIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/Ключевые слова:
the Police, accountability, supervision, external supervision, internal supervision, police powers, human rights and funadametal freedomsАннотация
This paper addresses the system of police accountability and
supervision, proceeding from the premise that, in the absence of
effective mechanisms of supervision, the rule of law, the protection of
human rights, and the safeguarding of fundamental freedoms are
deprived of their substantive meaning. In the Republic of Slovenia,
oversight mechanisms serve to ensure the legality, accountability, and
professional integrity of police operations, as well as the consistent
protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Within the context of legal and administrative theory, oversight is a
multifaceted concept appearing in various doctrinal frameworks and
carrying different meanings. For the purposes of this paper, it is defined
as a systematic process of reviewing the legality, propriety, and correctness of the execution of police tasks and the exercise of police
powers. Oversight constitutes an essential element of the state’s
responsibility to guarantee legality and to protect individuals against
unlawful interference by coercive state authorities, thereby upholding
the rule of law, with particular emphasis on police accountability.
The paper examines the various forms of oversight, with a primary
focus on external oversight of police activities in the Republic of
Slovenia. This form of oversight is exercised by multiple actors,
including the National Assembly, the Government, the judiciary and the
prosecution service, as well as by non-governmental organizations, the
media, the general public, and international institutions. Furthermore,
the paper analyses oversight conducted by the Ministry of the Interior
and internal oversight mechanisms carried out within the Police itself,
taking into account both its vertical chain of command and horizontal
organizational structure.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Anžič, A. (1997). The Security System of the Republic of Slovenia. Ljubljana: Official
Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.
Anžič, A. (2000). Ethical standards of supervisors in the supervisory process: An
insider’s perspective. Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice and
Security, Ljubljana: College of Police and Security Studies.
Brus, T. (2011). Oversight of Police Operations. Seminar paper. Nova Gorica:
European Faculty of Law.
Christián, L., & Bartóki-Gönczy, B. (2019). Actual questions of the Hungarian
private security market. Internal Security, 10(2), 77–186.
Čas, T. (2000). Private security, its development, and the activities of private security
services. Journal of Criminal Investigation and Criminology, 51(2), 124–134.
Čas, T. (2001). Privatization of security services and an analysis of the activities of
private security services in modern society. Journal of Criminal Investigation
and Criminology, 52(1), 32–42.
Čas, T. (2019). Police Law: Selected Topics for Students (2nd ed.). Ljubljana/Nova
Gorica: New University, European Faculty of Law.
Čas, T. (2023). A Strategic and Developmental View of Private Security in the
Republic of Slovenia, with an Emphasis on Private Security Services (1st ed.).
Ljubljana: Čas – Private School for Security Education.
Čas, T. (2024). A Strategic and Developmental View of Private Protection in Modern
Societies, with an Emphasis on Private Security: The Example of Slovenia.
Chișinău: Generis Publishing House.
Flander, B., Modic, M., Lobnikar, B., Tičar, B. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Police
Oversight System in Ensuring Compliance with Human Rights and Legal and
Professional Standards in Police Work. Final Report of the Targeted
Research Project. Faculty of Security Sciences.
Kečanovič, B. (2002). The importance of oversight in the protection of human rights
during proceedings conducted by coercive state authorities. In Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in Proceedings of Coercive
Authorities (Conference Proceedings). Ljubljana: Ministry of the Interior.
Klemenčič, G., Kečanović, B., & Žaberl, M. (2002). Your Rights in Police
Procedures. Ljubljana: Pasadena Publishing House.
Leksikon Cankarjeve založbe [Cankar Publishing House Encyclopedia] (3rd ed.).
(1994). Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.
Modic, M. (2020). Systemic Management and Supervision of Police Work in the
Republic of Slovenia: An Analysis of the Current Situation. Security Studies:
Journal of Security Theory and Practice. Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 375–389.
Organization and Work of the Police Act (Zakon o organiziranosti in delu v policiji
– ZODPol). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Nos. 15/13, 11/14, 86/15, 77/16, 77/17, 36/19, 66/19–ZDZ, 200/20, 172/21, 105/22–ZZNŠPP,
141/22, 85/25, and 14/26.
Pečar, J. (1988). Formal Oversight. Ljubljana: Delavska enotnost.
Rules on the Direction and Supervision of the Police (Pravilnik o usmerjanju in
nadzoru policije). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Nos. 15/22
and 128/22.
Senčar, A. (2003). Civilian Oversight of the Police. Bachelor's thesis. Ljubljana:
College of Police and Security Studies.
Dictionary of Standard Slovene (Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika). (1994).
Ljubljana: DZS.
Trpin, G. (2002). The relative autonomy of coercive state authorities. In Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in Proceedings of Coercive
Authorities (Conference Proceedings). Ljubljana: Ministry of the Interior.
Žaberl, M., Pozderec, F., & Oberman, I. (2017). Prevention of danger as a basis for
the exercise of security powers. Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice
and Security, 19(3), 273–292.
