THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN ANTI-FRAUD OFFICE (OLAF) IN THE REPORTEDCASES OF FRAUD ON THE FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION INREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/SCGW25112y73mnAbstract
As a candidate state for accession to the European Union, the Republic of North Macedonia, by signing the Framework Agreement on Financial Partnership between the European Commission and the Republic of North Macedonia, as a beneficiary of funds from the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (hereinafter referred to as 'IPA'), assumes the obligation to establish an efficient system for the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as 'EU'), which will also contribute to the protection of the national financial interests of the state. The efficiency of the control system over the implementation of IPA funds is determined by various factors, as follows: the established controls within the national administrative bodies of the state administration and IPA structures; criminal-legal protection in cases of suspected fraud; the harmonization of national legislation with the legislation of the European Union; and the effective cooperation of national authorities with the established European institutions responsible in the respective area. This paper will provide a comprehensive assessment of the cooperation between national authorities and European institutions in the area of protection of EU financial interests, with special emphasis on the jurisdiction of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as a sui generis institution of the European Union and the key institution responsible for investigating fraud, corruption, and other illegal activities that harm the financial interests of the EU. OLAF is an administrative body with specific investigative powers, and its structure and duties are detailed in EU regulations. In this regard, an overview of OLAF's regulation in terms of EU legislation will be elaborated, with special emphasis on the performance of OLAF’s duties in candidate states, particularly in cooperation with national law enforcement institutions, through a detailed normative analysis of relevant national and EU legislation. The paper will contribute to the process of enhancing the legal and institutional framework of the national system for the protection of EU financial interests, which will also have a direct impact on improving the protection of national financial interests.
Keywords: OLAF, protection of the EU financial interests,law enfrocment institutions
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Framework Agreement between the European Comission and the Republic of North Macedonia for
implementing the Instrument for pre-accession (IPA III), for the period 2021-2027 (Official
Gazzette of Republic of North Macedonia no.235, 04.11.2022)
Banking Law of Republic of North Macedonia (“Official Gazzette of Republic of Macedonia” no.
67/07, 90/09, 67/10, 26/13, 15/15, 153/15, 190/16, 7/19 and „Official Gazzete of Republic of
North Macedonia“ no. 101/19, 122/21 и 37/25)
Criminal Procedure Law (“Official Gazzette of Republic of North Macedonia” no.150/10)
Law on International Cooperation in Criminal Matters (“Official Gazzette” no.77/21.,
06.04.2021)
REGULATION (EU, EURATOM) No 883/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF
THE COUNCIL of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European
Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European
Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999
COUNCIL REGULATION (EURATOM, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning
on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the
European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities
REGULATION (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE
COUNCIL of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards
cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European
Anti-Fraud Office investigations
COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation
on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’)
Guidance note on main tasks and responsibilities of an Anti-Fraud Co-ordination Service (AFCOS)
B’E. Koen, (2017) - Learning Lessons - Reflecting on Regulation 883/2013 through Comparative
Analysis available on https://eucrim.eu/articles/learning-lessons-reflecting-regulation-883-
2013/
Scharf-Croner. Seyderhelm J. (2019)-OLAF Investigations Outside the European Union Practical and
Legal Aspects (2019) available on https://eucrim.eu/articles/learning-lessons-reflecting-
regulation-883-2013/
Courtney.H.A.(2022)- The Complementary Roles of the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the
European Anti-Fraud Office available on https://www.whitecase.com/insight-
alert/complementary-roles-european-public-prosecutors-office-and-european-anti-fraud-office
Official Journal of the European Union (2012) – Consolidated version of the Treaty on the
functioning of the European Union
Working Arrangment between the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Public
Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO)