FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE DIGITAL AGE:PLATFORM GOVERNANCE AND THE FACEBOOK–USER RELATIONSHIP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/Schlagwörter:
Freedom of Expression, Facebook, Defamation, Platform Governance, Human Rights.Abstract
In democratic societies where all forms of expression that propagate,
encourage, incite, or justify hatred based on intolerance are sanctioned
and prevented, the relationship between Facebook and the user can no
longer be considered merely private in nature. Facebook may undertake
actions to remove inappropriate content where users violate the ethical
principles and rules codified in the “Facebook Community Standards.”
Freedom of expression possesses a general character, yet it is not
absolute. When its limits are exceeded, legal disputes arise between the
user and the platform administrator concerning the nature, purpose, and
consequences of the opinions expressed online. In such disputes,
procedural guarantees and adversarial interaction between the parties
should be ensured before sanctions are imposed, including the removal
of content or suspension of accounts.
This paper analyzes the relationship between freedom of expression,
defamation, privacy, and platform governance in the digital age, with
particular emphasis on the legal responsibilities arising from hate
speech and defamatory publications on Facebook. The paper further
examines evidentiary standards, burden of proof, and the balancing of
freedom of expression with the protection of reputation and private life
under the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Alishani, A. (2001). Studies in the law of obligations I. Prishtina.
Amato, A., & Costagliola, A. (2012). Compendium of civil procedural law. Maggioli
Editore.
Brati, A. (2008). Procedura civile. Tirana.
Caracciolo, L. (2006). Civil procedural law. Milan.
Chopin, I., & Do, T. U. (2012). Developing anti-discrimination law in Europe: The
27 EU Member States, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and
Turkey compared. Publications Office of the European Union.
Dauti, N. (2002). Law of obligations. Prishtina.
Franceschetti, P. (2009). Civil liability. Maggioli Editore.
Fuga, J. (2000). Civil law: General part. Tirana.
Galatro, V. (2008). Operational manual of civil procedure. Maggioli S.p.A.
Gerlis, S. M., & Loughlin, P. (2001). Civil procedure. London.
Hasani, E. (1991). Ne bis in idem in civil procedure [Master’s thesis]. Prishtina.
Klarić, P., & Vedriš, M. (2006). Civil law. Zagreb.
Lazarević, A. (1986). Fundamentals of civil procedure (contentious procedure).
Skopje.
Morina, I., & Nikçi, S. (2012). Commentary – Law on Contested Procedure.
Prishtina.
Nathanaili, A. (1974). Civil law of Albania. Tirana.
Nuni, A. (2004). Lectures on civil law. Tirana.
Nuni, A. (2006). Introduction to civil law. Tirana.
Poznić, B. (1980). Civil procedural law (2nd ed.). Prishtina.
Rolland, B. (2007). Civil procedure: 30 summary sheets for preparing tutorials and
exam revision. Studyrama.
Spaić, V. (1957). Fundamentals of civil law. Sarajevo.
Steele, J. (2009). Tort law: Text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
Tahri, C. (2007). Civil procedure. Bréal.
Legislation
Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Albania. (1996). Republic of Albania.
Criminal Code of the Republic of North Macedonia. (1996). Republic of North
Macedonia.
Law on Civil Procedure of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2005). Official Gazette
of the Republic of North Macedonia.
Law on Courts of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2006). Official Gazette of the
Republic of North Macedonia.
Law on Prevention and Protection against Discrimination of the Republic of North
Macedonia. (2020). Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia.
