ASYLUM POLICY: THE CASE STUDY OF JULIAN ASSANGE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Abstract

This paper examines the complex dynamics of asylum policy in the context of international relations through a comprehensive case study of Julian Assange. As the founder of WikiLeaks and a prominent whistleblower, Assange sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid potential extradition to the United States. The thesis analyzes the motivations behind Assange’s efforts to seek asylum, exploring the legal challenges he faced, including the Swedish allegations and the broader implications for government transparency and whistleblower protection. The study delves into the diplomatic implications of Ecuador granting Assange asylum, which strained relations between Ecuador, the United Kingdom, and the United States. It highlights the interplay of human rights considerations in Assange’s case and the global impact on asylum seekers' rights. Furthermore, the research examines the role of media coverage in shaping public opinion and the influence of international responses to Assange’s asylum request. With global media at the forefront, the case underscored the complexities surrounding asylum policy and its intersection with press freedom. Drawing from a comparative analysis of other high-profile asylum cases, this research explores the broader political context in which Assange’s case unfolded, shedding light on the intricacies of state interactions concerning whistleblowers and government transparency. Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities and challenges of asylum policy in the realm of international relations, offering valuable insights into how nations respond to individuals seeking asylum in an ever-changing global political landscape.