PROCEDURAL RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Keywords:
Defendant, Criminal Code, Defendant's Rights, Process Subjects, International Instruments.Abstract
Criminal law in the broadest sense consists of three components: criminal substantive law, criminal procedural law and the law of enforcement of sanctions applied against perpetrators of criminal acts. Criminal procedural law, as a positive scientific discipline, has a general character and contains abstract legal norms that find their concretization when taking specific procedural actions taken during the criminal procedure. The largest reform of criminal procedural legislation was made in 2010 with the adoption of the new accusatory Law on Criminal Procedure. The right of the state to punish is implemented through the decision to protect certain goods by imposing penalties and other measures against the perpetrators of the incriminated actions. We will concentrate on the rights and position of the defendant in criminal proceedings, who is considered a person against whom an indictment has been filed or an indictment has been issued. We will also consider the rights and position of the defendant in the context of criminal proceedings. The subject of this paper is the general procedural rights of defendants in criminal proceedings, with a special emphasis on the comparative analysis between national legislation (Criminal Procedure Act – CPC), international standards (European Convention on Human Rights – ECHR), as well as German and American law. The aim is to investigate how the fundamental rights of defendants are ensured and to point out the similarities and differences in the different legal systems.
References
A Latinx Resource Guide. (1966). Miranda v. Arizona. Library of Congress,достапно на:https://guides.loc.gov/latinx-civil-rights/miranda-v-arizona. ,последно пристапено на:11.06.2025 година.
American Bar Association. (n.d.). Beyond a reasonable doubt standard.
America 250; The Federalist Society. (n.d.). Plea bargaining in America: An overview [Video]. The Federalist Society,достапно на:https://fedsoc.org/commentary/videos/plea-bargaining-in-america-an-overview-conversation-policybrief, последно пристапено на:15.06.2025 година.
Arifi, B. (n.d.). Споредбена анализа на правата на обвинетиот и правата на жртвата во новиот ЗКП и во практиката на Европскиот суд за човекови права. Прегледна научна статија.
Brindevska, S., & T., M. (2024). Кривична постапка. Скопје.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2002). 2 BvR 2048/01.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2023, October 31). Judgment of 31 October 2023.
de jure.org. (n.d.). Strafprozessordnung – StPO. ,достапно на: https://dejure.org/gesetze/StPO,последно пристапено на:15.07.2025 година.
Đurđević, Z. (2013). Osvrt na rezultate rada radne skupine Ministarstva pravosuđa za usklađivanje Zakona о kaznenom postupku s Ustavom Republike Hrvatske. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 1, 3–100.
European Court of Human Rights. (n.d.). Европска конвенција за човекови права – Член 6.
German Federal Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Strafprozessordnung (StPO). ,достапно на:https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/, последно пристапено на:18.07.2025 година.
Kalajdžiev, G. (2014). Ефективна одбрана во кривичните постапки во Република Македонија. Скопје.
Kalajdžiev, G. (2014, June). Ефективна одбрана во кривичните постапки во Република Македонија (стр. 49). Скопје.
Kambovski, V. (1998). Меѓународно казнено право (стр. 56). Просветно дело.
Krapac, D., Kalajdžiev, G., Kambovski, V., & Buzharovska, G. (2007). Стратегија за реформа на казненото право на Република Македонија. Министерство за правда, Скопје.
Macedonia, Republic of North. (n.d.). Закон за кривична постапка. Скопје.
Matovski, K., Lažetić-Bućarovska, G., & Kalajdžiev, G. (2009). Казнено процесно право. Скопје.
Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2010). Закон за кривична постапка (Службен весник бр. 150/2010), достапно на: https://jorm.gov.mk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Zakon_za_Krivicna_postapka_150_18112010-2.pdf, последно пристапено на:18.07.2025 година.
Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2010). Устав на Република Северна Македонија, чл. 13 ст. 1. Службен весник бр. 150/2010.
Schultz, D., & Vile, J. (n.d.). Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). In The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties in America. Taylor & Francis, достапно на:https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781315699868-287/gideon-wainwright-1963-david-schultz-john-vile, последно пристапено на:19.07.2025 година.
State Statistical Office. (n.d.). Податоци за судство, достапно на: https://makstat.stat.gov.mk/PXWeb/pxweb/mk/MakStat/MakStat__Sudstvo, последно пристапено на:19.07.2025 година.
Guide on Article 10 of the ECHR. (n.d.). Council of Europe., достапно на: https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/guide_art_10_mac, последно пристапено на:20.07.2025 година.
Судски одлуки:
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)., Gideon v. Wainwright | 372 U.S. 335 (1963) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)., Miranda v. Arizona | 384 U.S. 436 (1966) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
Allenet de Ribemont v. France (1995) , ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE
Allenet de Ribemont v. France, Application no. 15175/89, Judgment of 10 February
1995., ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE
Salduz v. Turkey, Application no. 36391/02, Judgment of 27 November 2008., SALDUZ v. TURKEY
Saunders v. United Kingdom, Application no. 19187/91, Judgment of 17 December 1996., SAUNDERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Mattoccia v. Italy, Application no. 23969/94, Judgment of 25 July 2000. MATTOCCIA v. ITALY
Kudła v. Poland, Application no. 30210/96, Judgment of 26 October 2000., Kudła v. Poland, Application no. 30210/96, Judgment of 26 October 2000. - Search