Conceptual and Definitional Polysemy of the Term of Culture in Contemporary Social Sciences
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present and analyse the conceptual and definitional polysemy of the term ‘culture’, as well as to emphasize some of the contemporary sociological and interdisciplinary concepts, theories and understandings of culture. This is an important topic in social sciences, actualized by contemporary theories of globalization, glocalization and discussions concerning global culture, contemporary transnational anthropological approaches to culture, sociological theories of modernity and modernization, “post-colonial discourse”, “strong program” in cultural sociology, contemporary postmodern theoretical turns such as “cultural turn”, “spatial turn”, “complexity turn”. In this regard, various new scientific and theoretical concepts, notions and understandings of culture in the “global age“ are developing. All of them have abandoned the traditional definition of culture as unique, homogeneous, closed, static, territorialized, national, and now emphasize the understanding of culture as a diverse, hybrid, heterogeneous, open, fluid, dynamic, deterritorialized and transnational. However, in contemporary debates concerning multiculturalism, identity politics, politicization of culture, and cultural rights, it remains unclear, and it is still an open question as to way the term of culture is be defined, whether the traditional concept of culture is used, or whether culture is understood in a new way, which again updates its conceptual and definitional polysemy. In that sense, this paper points out the importance of defining the term of culture and the need to explain different usages and concepts of culture in contemporary social sciences.
Keywords: culture, globalization, post-modern theoretical turn.Downloads
References
Abercrombie, N.; Hill, S.; Turner, B. S. (2008). Rječnik sociologije. Zagreb:
Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Alexander, J. C.; Smith, P. (2003). „The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics“. In: Alexander, J. C. The meanings of social life: a cultural sociology (pp. 11-26). Oxford University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Beck, U. (2001). Pronalaženje političkoga: prilog teoriji refleksivne Modernizacije. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Beck, U. (2003). Što je globalizacija? Zablude globalizma – odgovori na Globalizaciju. Zagreb: Vizura.
Castells, M. (2000). Uspon umreženog društva. Zagreb: Golden marketing.
Castells, M. (2002). Moć identiteta. Zagreb: Golden marketing.
Crespi, F. (2006). Sociologija kulture. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
Čačić-Kumpes, J. (2004). „Politike reguliranja kulturne i etničke različitosti: o pojmovima i njihovoj upotrebi“. Migracijske i etničke teme, Vol. 20, No. 2-3, 143-159.
Eagleton, T. (2002). Ideja kulture. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Eagleton, T. (2005). Teorija i nakon nje. Zagreb: Algoritam.
Featherstone, M. (1990). „Global Culture: An Introduction“. In: Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity (Ed.) Featherstone, M., (pp. 1-14). London, Newbury Park, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Hannerz, U. (1997). „Flows, boundaries and hybrids: keywords in transnational anthropology“, pp. 2-25.; URL: http://www.transcomm.ox.ac.uk/working%20papers/hannerz.pdf (July, 2012).
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Jeknić, R. (2014). „Religion and Culture in the Global World: from Classical to Contemporary Sociological Theories of Modernity, Modernization and Development“. The Conference Proceedings: „Social change in the global world“. Vol. 2, pp. 777- 805. Center for Legal and Political Research, Faculty of Law, Shtip: Goce Delcev University.
Kalanj, R. (2000). Ideje i djelovanje: ogledi o kulturnim promjenama i Razvoju. Zagreb: Razvoj i okoliš.
Kalanj, R. (2004). Globalizacija i postmodernost: ogledi o misliocima globalne kompleksnosti. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
Kalanj, R. (2006). „Argumenti za sociologiju kulture“. In: Crespi, F. Sociologija kulture (pp. 194-210). Zagreb: Politička kultura.
Katunarić, V. (2007). Lica kulture. Zagreb: Biblioteka Antibarbarus.
Kloskowska, A. (2003). Sociologija kulture. Sarajevo: KRUG 99.
Lewis, R. D. (2006). When Cultures Collide: Leading Across Cultures. Boston, London: Nicholas Brealey International.
Mesić, M. (2006). Multikulturalizam: društveni i teorijski izazovi. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Paić, Ž. (2005). Politika identiteta: kultura kao nova ideologija. Zagreb: Biblioteka Antibarbarus.
Paić, Ž. (2008). „Što nakon kulture? Teorije preokreta i preokret teorija u globalno doba“. Politička misao. Vol. XLV, No. 1, pp. 29-70.
Ritzer, G. (2010). Globalization: a basic text. Wiley-Blackwell, A John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Publication.
Robertson, R. (2003). „Globalization Theory 2000+: Major Problematics“. In:
Ritzer, G.; Smart, B. (Ed.) Handbook of Social Theory, pp. 458-471. London,Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Said, E. W. (1999). Orijentalizam. Zagreb: Konzor.
Said, E. W. (2002). Kultura i imperijalizam. Beograd: Beogradski krug.
Skledar, N. (2001). Čovjek i kultura: uvod u socio-kulturnu antropologiju. Zagreb: Societas, Zavod za sociologiju, Matica hrvatska Zaprešić.
Švob Đokić, N. (2010). „Kulturni opstanak, nestanak ili transformacija“. In: Kultura/ Multikultura, (Ed.) Švob-Đokić, N., pp. 15-47. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk, Hrvatsko sociološko društvo.
Touraine, A. (2000). Can we live together? Equality and difference, California: Stanford University Press.
Touraine, A. (2007). Kritika modernosti. Zagreb: Politička kultura. Urry, J. (2005). „The Complexity Turn“. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 22(5), pp. 1–14.
Vrcan, S. (2001). „Kultura kao društveno opasan pojam“. Reč: Časopis za književnost i kulturu i društvena pitanja, No. 61/7, pp. 107-113.
Wallerstein, I. (1990). „Culture as the Ideological Battleground of the Modern World System“. In: Featherstone, M. (Ed.) Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, pp. 31-55. London, Newbury Park, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Zeman, Z. (2004). Autonomija i odgođena apokalipsa: sociologijske teorije modernosti i modernizacije. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
Permissions
Authors are expected to obtain permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. BSSR will not be held accountable for any copyright infringement caused by the authors.
Copyright
The content offered in the BSSR remains the intellectual property of the authors and their publishers respectively. University “Goce Delcev”- Shtip, R. Macedonia and BSSR keap the right to promote and re-publish the texts.
