Joint Exercise of Parental Rights in the Context of Divorce

  • Tanja Kitanovic Faculty of Law, University of Nis, Serbia

Abstract

Joint exercise of parental rights is an adequate form of parental care after divorce if the parents are able to overcome mutual animosity, and resolve conflicts, that may result in the complete dissolution of the family unit. Joint custody eliminates the negative effects of the sole exercise of parental rights since former spouses still have equal legal status after divorce so that they are jointly responsible for raising a child. In joint custody, parents jointly exercise all rights and responsibilities of parenting and make agreements, whereas the physical custody of the child in most cases belongs to one parent, though there may be an option of the child’s alternate residence with both parents, in which case both parents alternately have the custody of the child.
The concept of joint exercise of parental rights is based on the idea of equally important role of both parents in the proper physical and mental development of the child and on the principle of parents’ equality in relation to the child. In addition, joint custody endeavors to preserve the relationship between the child and the parent with whom it does not live. Therefore, the positive effects of joint custody reflect on all participants in the relation of parental rights.
In the European legal space joint custody after divorce is exceptionally popular. However, since it was legalized in 2005, this form of parenting by divorced parents has not been sufficiently established in practice in the Republic of Serbia. Still, with the further insight into the advantages of the joint custody, it is reasonable to expect that parents will increasingly opt for this form of care. In addition, given the evolution of the model of joint care in comparative law, it is reasonable to conclude that in due course the presumption of joint exercise of parental rights after divorce will find its place in the Serbian legal system.
Key words: joint exercise of parental rights, divorce, parents, children, Serbian law, comparative law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antokolskaia, M., Parental Responsibilities, National Report, Russia, http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/Russia-Parental-Responsibiliti- es.pdf, access 15 May 2014.

Antokolskaia, M., Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses, National Report, Russia, http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/ Russia-Divorce.pdf, access 15 May 2014.

Burgerlijk Wetboek (Dutch Civil Code), http://www.wetboek=online. nl./wet/ BW1.html, access 18 May 2014.

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code), http://bundesrecht. juris.de/bundesrecht/bgb, access 18 May 2014.

Code civil (French Civil Code), http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721, access 18 May 2014.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (CETS No. 005), http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/ Commun/QueVoulez Vous.asp?NT=005&CM=8&DF=18/05/2014.

Cvejić-Jančić, O., Zajedničko vršenje roditeljskog prava, Pravni život, no. 9/1997.

Dethloff, N., Martiny, D., Parental Responsibilities, National Report, Germany, http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/Germany-Parental- Responsibilities.pdf, access 15 May 2014.

Draškić, M., "Obavezno lišenje roditeljskog prava prilikom odlučivanja suda o vršenju roditeljskog prava - sporno stanovište Vrhovnog suda Srbije", Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 1/2012.

Forder, C., Re-thinking Marriage, Parenthood and Adoption, The International Survey of Family Law, A. Bainham (ed.), The Hague, Boston, London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995.

Hausheer, H., Geiser, T., Aebi-Müller, R. E., Das Familienrecht des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches, Stämpfli Verlag AG Bern, 2007.

Jänterä-Jareborg, M., Singer, A., Sörgjerd, C., Parental Responsibilities, National Report, Sweden, http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/Sweden-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf, access 15 May 2014.

Kitanović, T., Sporazumni razvod braka u domaćem i uporednom pravu, PhD thesis, Novi Sad, 2011.

Kovaček-Stanić, G., O roditeljskom pravu u teoriji i praksi Švedske, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 1-2/1990.

Kovaček-Stanić, G., Uporedno porodično pravo, Novi Sad, 2002.

Kovaček-Stanić, G., Porodično pravo: partnersko, dečje i starateljsko pravo, Novi Sad, 2007.

Krause, H. D., Marriage for the New Millennium: heterosexual, same sex – or not at all, Deutsches und Europäisches Familienrecht, Volume 2, Number 4/December, 2000.

Mladenović, M., Da li porodica ima budućnost, Pravni život, no. 9/1996.

Parkinson, L., Child Custody Orders: A Legal Lottery? Family Law, Volume 18, January 1988.

Porodični zakon Srbije, "Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije", br. 18/2005 i 72/2011 (Serbian Family Act, "Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", no. 18/2005 and 72/2011).

Prednacrt Građanskog zakonika Srbije (Pre-Draft of Serbian Civil Code), http://arhiva.mpravde.gov.rs/lt/articles/zakonodavna-aktivnost/ gradjanski-zakonik, access 18 May 2014.

Schwab, D., Familienrecht, Verlag, C. H. Beck, München, 2008.

Семейный кодекс Российской Федерации (Family Code of Russia), http:// www.zakonrf.info/sk/, access 18 May 2014.

Standley, K., Family Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

The Children and Parents Code (SFS 1949:381), http://www. government.se/sb/d/3926/a/27655, access 18 May 2014.

The Children Act (1989), www.statutelaw.gov.uk, access 18 May 2014.

Wallerstein, J., Corbin, S. B., Father – Child Relationships after Divorce: Child Support and Educational Opportunity, Family Law Quarterly, 1986, 20 (2).

Zakon o braku i porodičnim odnosima Srbije, "Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije", br. 22/1980, 11/1988, 22/1993, 25/1993, 35/1994, 46/1995 i 29/2001 (Law on Marriage and Family Relations of Serbia "Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia ", no. 22/1980, 11/1988, 22/1993, 25/1993, 35/1994, 46/1995 and 29/2001).

Zivilgesetzbuch (Swiss Civil Code), http://www.admin.ch/opc/de/ classified-compilation/1907 0042/index.html, access 18 May 2014.

Published
2015-01-20
Section
Articles-LAW