Results of the Procedure for Determining the Representativeness of Trade Unions and Employers' Associations in the Republic of Macedonia in 2010 (First count)

  • Andon Majhoshev Univesity Goce Delchev- Shtip, Faculty of Law, Macedonia
  • Jadranka Denkova Univesity Goce Delchev- Shtip, Faculty of Law, Macedonia

Abstract

This paper deals with the issue of representation of trade unions and employers' associations in the process of collective bargaining and tripartite bodies and institutions in the Republic of Macedonia, where emphasis is placed on the representative model of representation. The paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of majority and representative model of representation. In this context, we analyzed the provisions of the Labor Law pertaining to the criteria of representativeness of trade unions and employers' associations. The paper also deals with the role, responsibilities, and structure of the Commission for Determining for Representation, as well as with overall legal procedure for obtaining the representative status of trade unions and employers' associations. A separate section of the paper presents the results of representation of trade unions and employers' associations in a table. The end of the paper contains the conclusions to which the authors come in their research.
Key words: representativeness, trade unions, employers' associations, criteria for representativeness, Commission for Determining Representation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andon Majhoshev, Univesity Goce Delchev- Shtip, Faculty of Law, Macedonia
Faculty of Law, University "Goce Delcev"- Shtip, MAcedonia
Jadranka Denkova, Univesity Goce Delchev- Shtip, Faculty of Law, Macedonia
Faculty of Law, University "Goce Delcev"- Shtip, MAcedonia

References

Employee representatives in an enlarged Europe, Volume 1, European Commission, Brussels, 2008.

Employee representatives in an enlarged Europe, Volume 2, European Commission, Brussels, 2008

Industrial Relations in Europe, European Commission, Brussels, 2009

Casale Giuseppe, “Social Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe”, ILO, Budapest, 1999;

Casale Giuseppe, “Tripartism and Social Dialogue”, ILO, Budapest, 1997.

Lubarda Branko, Leksikon industrijskih odnosa, Radnicka stampa, Beograd, 1997;

Lubarda Branko, Resavanje kolektivnih radnih sporova, JURS, Beograd, 1999;

Lubarda, Branko, Evropsko radno pravo, CID, Podgorica;

Salmon Michael, Industrial Relations-theory and practice, Third edition,1998.

Neil Chamberlain&James W. Kuhn, Collective Bargaining, Third Edition, 1986.

James P. Begin&Edwin F. Beal, The practice of Collective Bargaining, Chapter Eight, 1989.

Richard E. Walton and Robert B. McKersie, A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1965.

Вотсон Филип, Социјално право и ЗРО на ЕУ – Политика и практика во проширена Европа, Просветно дело, Скопје, 2009.

Laws

Labor Law of RM, Official Gazette no. 80/93 and all subsequent novelties.

Labor Law of RM, Official Gazette no. 62/05and all subsequent novelties.

Labor Law of RM, revised text (Official Gazette of RM no. 16/10)

Texts

Trudbenik, К-15 или штрајк, бр.16., 1998, стр.13

Vreme, Преговори за колективен договор, бр. 66 од 25.07.2007.

Dnevnik, Македонија е без социјален дијалог, 27.11.2007.

Dnevnik, Лакрдија со колективниот договор за јавниот сектор, 18.01.2008.

Dnevnik, Долг е патот до европска социјална политика, 10.05.2010.

Vreme, Да си оди министерот Мешков, 18.01.2008.

Dnevnik, Синдикалците бараат нов колективен договор, 25.01.2008.

Шпиц, Ваков колективен договор нема ни во Руанда, 26/27.01.2008.

Dnevnik, На Муратовски пак му виси фотелјата, 8.04.2010

Dnevnik, Зошто се самоубиваат кинеските работници?, 21.06.2010

Internet sources

www.avrm.gov.mk

www.mtsp.gov.mk

www.sei.gov.mk

www.mchamber.org

www.sojuzkomori.org

www.oempv.org.mk

www.eurofound.europa.eu/dictionary/definitions/

www.poslodavci-apps.org.rs

Published
2015-01-20
Section
Articles-POLITICS AND SOCIETY