UNTANGLING THE POPULIST KNOT: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND THE STRUGGLE FOR RULE OF LAW RESTORATION IN POLAND

Authors

  • Jowanka JAKUBEK-LALIK Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR25262631jl

Abstract

This article explores the significant challenges of restoring the rule of law in Poland following a period of democratic backsliding in 2015-2023. It also analyzes how administrative law was distinctively well suited for instrumentalization by the populist government, facilitated by its standard features like enforcement privileges and policy discretion when constitutional checks were weakened. This strategic use of administrative tools, alongside attacks on judicial independence, created a deeply interwoven "populist knot" of legal and political changes.

Rule of law restoration in Poland is not just legal reversal, but a profound political struggle within a polarized society. It is constrained by institutional factors such as cohabitation with two consecutive Presidents, who are aligned with the previous ruling party, and the control of key bodies like the Constitutional Tribunal and the National Council of the Judiciary (KRS) by political appointees. While some progress is being made through actions not requiring legislation, reforming the administrative state and its legal framework to prevent future instrumentalization remains a huge challenge, especially in the light of the 2025 presidential elections, surprisingly won by a populist candidate opposing the government.

An important problem is also confronting the administrative law's own potential for authoritarian use and to ensure it serves its protective function for all. The article argues that understanding how administrative law is being instrumentalized and addressing its structural vulnerabilities is crucial for building a resilient rule of law system against future populist pressures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jowanka JAKUBEK-LALIK, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw

    ORCiD: 0000-0002-4365-1423

References

6. Antoszewski, A. (2018). „Demokracja nieliberalna jako projekt polityczny” [„Illiberal democracy as a political project”]. Przegląd Europejski, 2018(2).

7. Bendyk, E., Czapliński, P., & Kosiewski, P. (Eds.). (2024). Prawda po wyborach 15 października 2023 [The Truth After the Elections on October 15, 2023], Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, Warszawa, https://www.batory.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Prawda.po_wyborach.15.pazdziernika.2023_Zbior.tekstow.pdf (accessed 16.10.2025).

8. Bignami, F. (2020). EU Law in Populist Times: Crises and Prospects. Cambridge University Press.

9. Bill, S., Stanley B. (2025), “Democracy After Illiberalism: A Warning form Poland”, Journal of Democracy, July 2025, issue 3, pp. 16-32.

10. Canovan, M. (2002). “Taking politics to the people: Populism as an ideology of democracy”. In: Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 66–87). Palgrave Macmillan.

11. Daly, T. (2019). “Democratic Decay: Conceptualizing an Emerging Research Field”. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11, 9–36.

12. Fraenkel, E. (1941). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Oxford University Press.

13. Freedom House 2022 ranking: https://freedomhouse.org/country/poland/nations-transit/2022 (accessed 16.10.2025).

14. Grabowska-Moroz, B. and Śniadach, O. (2021), “The Role of Civil Society in Protecting Judicial Independence in Times of Rule of Law Backsliding in Poland” (October 7, 2021). Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 59, 69 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3963277

15. Jakubek-Lalik, J. (2020). “Transition from Authoritarian Regime to Democracy: The Role of Local Self-Government. The case of Poland”. International Journal of Civil Service Reform and Practice, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.122

16. Jakubek-Lalik, J. (2023). “Administrative Law and Human Rights in the Times of Populism and Democratic Decay - Reflections in the Context of Central and Eastern Europe”. In: State, Security and Human Rights in Digital Era [Statul, securitatea şi drepturile omului în era digital], (pp. 60-71). Universitatea de Stat din Moldova, Chișinău, Republica Moldova. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7869791

17. Karolewski, I.P., Sata P., “The dual state of judiciary in Hungary and Poland”, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, vol 17 2025

18. Meierhenrich, J. (2018), The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law (Oxford, 2018; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Apr. 2018).

19. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism. University of Pennsylvania Press.

20. Orbán, V. (2014, July 26). Full Text of Viktor Orban’s Speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnadfurdo) of 26 July 2014. Retrieved from https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp (accessed 16.10.2025)

21. Över, D., Santana, E., & Amaral, O. (2025). “Authoritarian legacies in law and democratic backsliding: The case of Turkey’s specially authorized courts”, Law & Social Inquiry, Advance online publication (pp. 1–28). https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2025.10099

22. Petrov, J. (2024), “How to Detect Abusive Constitutional Practices”, European Constutional Law Review, 2024/2

23. Schotel, B. (2021). “Administrative Law as a Dual State. Authoritarian Elements of Administrative Law”. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 13, 195–222.

24. Sześciło, D. (2019). “Is There A Room For Local And Regional Self-Government In The Illiberal Democracy? Struggle Over Recentralization Attempts In Poland”. Studia Iuridica, 79, 166-179.

25. Tekin, S. (2022) “The Dual State in Turkey”, European Journal of Turkish Studies 34 | 2022, Online since 30 June 2023, connection on 02 September 2025. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/8000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.8000

26. Tudor, M. (2023). Why India’s democracy is dying. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 121–132.

27. Włoch, W., Serowaniec, M. (2025) “Constitutional deconstruction as a form of extra- systemic dissensus: the Polish case”, European Political Science, 2025, vol 24.

28. Wójcik, A. (2025). Rebuilding the rule of law in Poland : The slow and arduous process towards judicial independence / Anna Wójcik. - Warszawa : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Warsaw, February 2025. - 15 Seiten = 210 KB, PDF File. - (Analysis) Electronic ed.: Warschau : FES, 2025 ISBN 978-83-64062-77-3, https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/warschau/21873.pdf (accessed 16.10.2025).

29. Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 22.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25