INTERPRETATIVE DECISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF NORTH MACEDONIA IN THE FUNCTION OF PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR25262653kAbstract
The paper examines the “tense” relationship between the Constitutional Court and the Assembly through the prism of two significant innovations in constitutional judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia. The first concerns the introduction of what, in European constitutional judiciary, is called an “interpretative decision”. Pursuant to Article 36 of the Act of the Court, the Court can conduct an initial review of constitutionality, can express doubts and instituted proceedings, and in the resolution can set out its legal positions, but defers the final decisions and prescribes a time-limit for the adopter to bring the regulation into conformity, under the repressive “threat” of a repealing or annulling decision. The purpose of this innovation is for the Court to preserve the integrity of the legal order while granting the body that adopted the contested regulation one further (time-limited) opportunity to correct itself and return to the sphere of constitutionality, thereby preventing legal vacuums that could have serious implications for the order.
The paper will analyze the objectives, the legal nature and the effect of this type of “repressive interpretative decisions”, the grounds for their introduction, and their impact on the “tense” and complex interaction between the Constitutional Court (as a negative) and the Assembly (as a positive legislator).
The second innovation consists of the introduction of the possibility for the Court to monitor the implementation of constitutionality, legality, and the rights and freedoms of individuals and citizens as guaranteed by the Constitution, and, at its own discretion, to adopt a special report indicating the need for measures to be undertaken for their realization and protection, which shall be submitted to the competent authority.
Downloads
References
1. Arlović, M. (2015, May 18–20). Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia with special reference to the grace period (types, legal nature, and effects) [Paper presentation]. Roundtable on The legal nature of the decisions of the Constitutional Court and their consequences, Miločer, Montenegro.
2. Bačić, P. (2010). Constitutionalism and judicial activism [Konstitucionalizam i sudski aktivizam]. Pravni fakultet u Splitu.
3. Brewer-Carías, A. R. (2011). Constitutional courts as positive legislators: A comparative law study. Cambridge University Press.
4. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2017). Decision No. 137/2017 (July 17, 2025) [Unpublished decision].
5. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2020). Decision No. 247/2020 (May 25, 2021). https://ustavensud.mk/archives/21026.
6. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2022). Decision No. 113/2022-1 (March 21, 2023).
7. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2022). Separate opinion in case No. 4/2022 [Издвоено мислење по предметот У.бр.4/2022].
8. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2023a). Decision No. 162/2023 and 163/2023 (February 12, 2025).
9. Constitutional Court of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2023b). Decision No. 81/2023 (December 5, 2023).
10. European Court of Human Rights. (1978, April 25). Tyrer v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 5856/72).
11. Fallon, R. H., Jr. (2001). Implementing the Constitution. Harvard University Press.
12. Jackson, V. C. (2010). Constitutional dialogue in transnational perspective. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq013.
13. Kostadinovski, D. (2021). Loyalty to the Constitution 1 – The separate opinions of judge Dr. Darko Kostadinovski. AD Kultura.
14. Kostadinovski, D. (2023). Loyalty to the Constitution 2 – Interpretation of the Constitution. AD Kultura.
15. Kostadinovski, D. (2024). Loyalty to the Constitution 3 – The theory of living constitutionalism. AD Kultura.
16. Kostadinovski, D. (2025). Loyalty to the Constitution 4 – Implementation of the decisions of the Constitutional Court. AD Kultura.
17. Marinko, T. (2004). Interpretative Constitutional Court’s Decisions [Интерпретативне одлуке уставних судова]. In Constitutional Court of Serbia - Towards the new Constitution of Serbia, Collection of works (pp. 243–261). Belgrade.
18. Omejec, J. (2009). On the necessary reforms in the structure of Croatian constitutional justice [O porebnim promjenama u strukturi hrvatskog ustavnog sudovanja]. In J. Barbić (Ed.), Croatian constitutional justice [Hrvatsko ustavno sudovanje] (pp. 31–33). HAZU.
19. Pajić, N. (2014). Interpretative decisions in the practice of the Constitutional Court of Serbia [Интерпретативне одлуке у пракси Уставног суда Србије]. Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, 359–373.
20. Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law. Harvard University Press.
21. Scholler, H. (2000). The principle of the rule of law in the practice of the Federal Constitutional Court with respect to the binding legal force of judgments. In Constitutional Court in the protection of human rights. Zagreb.
22. Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution away from the courts. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permissions
Authors are expected to obtain permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. BSSR will not be held accountable for any copyright infringement caused by the authors.
Copyright
The content offered in the BSSR remains the intellectual property of the authors and their publishers respectively. University “Goce Delcev”- Shtip, R. Macedonia and BSSR keap the right to promote and re-publish the texts.
