ACCOUNTING BOOKS AS EVIDENCE IN TAX AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR25262699dAbstract
The authors’ focus is directed toward the analysis of one frequently used means of evidence, as well as a comparative analysis of this means of evidence in tax and criminal proceedings. After a brief overview of the taxpayers’ obligation to keep accounting books, special attention is devoted to the role of accounting books as evidence, first in tax proceedings and then in criminal proceedings.The importance of business books from the aspect of tax and criminal proceedings is reflected in the fact that in the event of a lack of evidence of the existence of the criminal offense of tax evasion, the court will issue an acquittal. Namely, there is a possibility that during the tax proceedings, omissions may occur that relate to an inadequately determined amount of tax liability or inadequate documentation used when determining the tax liability. In such cases, an expert examination of business books is a crucial evidentiary measure for convicting the perpetrator of the criminal offense of tax evasion. Irregularities in the keeping of business books during the tax proceedings may lead to an acquittal of the tax evader due to a lack of evidence.
For certain types of taxes, as well as for particular categories of taxpayers, accounting books play a key role in determining their tax liability. This raises the question of whether the role of this means of evidence in tax and criminal proceedings has been adequately regulated by the applicable procedural laws. In response to this question, the authors, on the basis of the results obtained from their research, will propose a de lege ferenda solution.
Downloads
References
1. Andjelković, M. (2008. Javne finansije i finansijsko pravo [Public Finance and Financial Law]. Niš: Pravni fakultet.
2. Andjelković, M. (2008) Fundamentalna prava poreskih obveznika i njihova zaštita u savremenim informaciono-tehnološkim uslovima [Fundamental rights of taxpayers and their protection in modern information technology conditions], Strani pravni život, br.3, pp. 163-178.
3. Andjelković, M. (2016) Neke specifičnosti poreske kontrole u savremenim uslovima poslovanja [Some specifics of tax control in modern business conditions], Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br.74, pp. 161-173.
4. Asian Development Bank (2009). Process map an the criminal prosecution of tax evasion in the Philippines. Philippines.
5. Bejatović, S. (2014). ZKP Srbije iz 2011 – Kraj reforme ili samo jedan neuspešan korak procesa reforme! [CPC of Serbia from 2011 – End of reform or just one unsuccessful step of the reform process!], Strani pravni život, br.1, pp. 45-67.
6. Božić, V., Dimić, S., Đukić, M., (2020). Some Issues of Processing Tax fraud in Criminal Legislation of the Republic of Serbia, Balkan Social Science Review, Vol.16, pp. 89-107.
7. Criminal Code, Official Gazette of the RS, no 85/2005, 88/2005 – corrected, 107/2005 – corrected, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019 and 94/2024.
8. Criminal Procedure Code, Official Gazette of the FRY, no. 70/2001 and 68/2002 and Official Gazette of RS, no.58/2004, 85/2005, 115/2005, 85/2005-dr. law, 49/2007, 20/2009- dr. law, 72/2009 and 76/2010.
9. Criminal Procedure Code, Official Gazette of the RS, no. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014, 35/2019, 27/2021-decision US and 62/2021-decision US.
10. Dimitropoulos, G., Reading, M., (2025), Forensic accounting as an investigative tool: Insights from the FTX and Qatargate, Journal of Economic Criminology, No. 7, pp. 1-20.
11. Gobert, J., Pascal, A. (2011). European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability, New York: Routledge Advances in Criminology.
12. Lalović, M. (2018). Uloga veštaka u krivičnom postupku I ekonomsko finansijskom veštačenju kod izbegavanja plaćanja poreskih obaveza (The role of experts in criminal proceedings and economic and financial expertise in tax evasion), Iustitia, br.2, pp. 29-45.
13. Law on Accounting, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, 73/2019. 44/2021.
14. Law on Corporate Income Tax, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 25/01, 80/02, 43/03, 84/04, 18/10, 101/11, 119/12, 47/13, 108/13, 68/14, 142/14, 91/15, 112/15, 113/17, 95/18, 86/19, 153/20, 118/21, 94/24.
15. Law on General Administrative Procedure, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia 18/2016, 95/2018, 2/2023.
16. Law on Income Tax of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 24/01, 80/02, 135/04, 62/06, 31/09, 44/09, 18/10, 50/11, 91/11, 93/11,93/12, 114/12, 47/!3, 48/13, 108/13, 57/14, 68/14, 5/15, 112/15, 5/16, 7/17, 113/17, 7/18, 9/18, 4/19, 86/19, 5/20,153/20, 156/20, 6/21, 44/21, 118/21, 132/21, 10/22, 138/22, 144/22, 6/23, 116/23, 6/24, 94/24, 101/24, 8/25, 19/25.
17. Law on Tax Procedure and Tax Administration, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, 80/02, 84/02, 79/03, 55/04, 61/05, 85/05, 62/06, 61/07, 20/09, 72/09, 53/10, 101/11, 2/12, 93/12, 47/13, 108/13, 68/14, 105/14, 91/14, 112/15, 15/16, 108/16, 30/18, 95/18, 86/19, 144/20, 96/21, 138/22 and 94/24.
18. Marković, V. B. (1908). O dokazima u krivičnom postupku [About evidence in criminal proceeding]. Beograd: Policijski glasnik.
19. Milkov, D. L., Radošević, R. S:, (2024). Prikupljanje procesnog materijala i teret dokazivanja u upravnom postupku [Collection of procedural material and burden of proof in administrative proceedings], Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br.3, pp. 517-539.
20. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Serbia. Mišljenje Ministarstva finansija [Opinion Ministry of Finance], br. 011-00-00179/2022-04 od 15. 08. 2022, Bilten Ministarstva finansija Republike Srbije, br.7-8, jul-avgust 2022.godina, LXII [Bulletin of the Ministry of finance of the Republic of Serbia No. 7-8, July-august 2022, LXII].
21. OECD (2017). Fighting Tax Crime: The Ten Global Principles, Paris: OECD Publishing.
22. OECD (2024). Tax Administration 2024: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies, OECD Publishing. Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2d5fba9c-en.
23. Oni, O. S., Godwin, O. E. (2023). Forensic accounting evidence: Preservation and admissibility, Natioanal Journal of Multridisciplinary Research and Development, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 53-58.
24. Owens, J., (2012). Tax Administrators, Taxpayers and Their Advisors: Can the Dynamics of the Relationship Be Changed?, Bulletin for international Taxation, september 2012, IBFD, pp. 516-518. https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/i/taxlaw/Institut_the_Institute/Institute/staff/publications/bifd091206.pdf, visited: 02.05.2025.
25. Pamisety, V. (2025), Fiscal Intelligence: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Analytics for Modern Tax Governance. USA/UK/India/Turkey: Deep Science Publishing.
26. Popović, D. (2012). Poresko pravo [Tax Law]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet.
27. Raonić, I, (2018). Dokazna radnja – veštačenje u sudskim postupcima [Evidential action – expert testimony in court proceedings]. Iustitia, br.2, pp. 12-15.
28. Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. (2010). Financial Statement Fraud – Prevention and Detection. New Jersey: Jonh Wiley&Sons.
29. Škulić, M. (2007). Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku [Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
30. Tomić, Z, (2015). Pogled na opšti poreski procesni zakon – neke odabrane upravne dileme [A look at the general tax procedural law – some selected administrative dilemmas]. Pravo i privreda, br.7-9, pp. 420-437.
31. Vodinelić, V. (1994). Naučni problemi na relaciji dokazni izvor – dokaz – dokazivanje u krivičnom procesnom pravu [Scientific problems in the relationship between evidentiary source – evidence – proving in criminal procedural law]. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, br.3-4, pp. 282-297.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permissions
Authors are expected to obtain permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. BSSR will not be held accountable for any copyright infringement caused by the authors.
Copyright
The content offered in the BSSR remains the intellectual property of the authors and their publishers respectively. University “Goce Delcev”- Shtip, R. Macedonia and BSSR keap the right to promote and re-publish the texts.
