ON A CONSTITUTIONAL AND NATIONAL IDENTITY OF THE EU MEMBER STATES: SAME BUT DIFFERENT?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR252626157kAbstract
This article examines whether the concepts of national identity and constitutional identity in the European Union’s legal framework can be used interchangeably. By tracing the historical evolution and travaux préparatoires of Article 4(2) TEU, the paper demonstrates that the drafters consistently employed the term national identity as an autonomous concept of EU primary law, deliberately omitting any reference to constitutionality. Building on the theoretical framework proposed by Elise Cloots, the article develops a teleological and interpretative argument showing that the interchangeable use of these terms lacks textual and historical support. It then examines how Member States’ constitutional courts, particularly the German Federal Constitutional Court have constructed a doctrine of constitutional identity review rooted in national constitutional law. This jurisprudence distinguishes constitutional identity as an absolute, domestically defined limit to European integration, while national identity under Article 4(2) TEU functions as a principle of respect constraining the exercise of Union competences. The article concludes that conflating these two notions risks both conceptual confusion and constitutional deadlock within the EU. A clear differentiation between national and constitutional identity is therefore essential for maintaining a coherent balance between national sovereignty and the primacy of EU law.
Downloads
References
1. Bartal, D. (1998). Group beliefs as an expression of social identity. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Páez, & J. C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279205.
2. Besselink, L. F. M. (2010). National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon. In Utrecht Law Review, 6(3), pp. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.139.
3. Besselink, L. F. M. (2012). Respecting constitutional identity in the EU? Common Market Law Review, 49(3), pp. 671–693.
4. Blagojević, A. (2017). Procedures regarding national identity clause in the national constitutional courts’ and the CJEU’s case-law. In Procedural Aspects of EU Law: EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series.
5. Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity.” In Theory and Society, 29(1), pp. 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468.
6. Callies, E., & Van der Schyff, G. (Eds.). (2021). Constitutional identity in a Europe of multilevel constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press.
7. Christophersen, H. (2002a). Option paper: Highlighting the limits of EU competence (Working Document 5, Working Group V ‘Complementary Competences’). Brussels: European Convention Secretariat.
8. Christophersen, H. (2002b). Speech to the Convention: The competences of the European Union and supporting measures [Address to the European Convention, Working Group V “Complementary Competences”]. Brussels.
9. Claes, M. (2012). Negotiating constitutional identity or whose identity is it anyway? In M. Claes, M. de Visser, P. Popelier, & C. Van de Heyning (Eds.), Constitutional conversations in Europe, Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 205–221.
10. Cloots, E. (2015). National identity in EU law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198733768
11. de Benoist, A. (2007). Nous et les autres: Problématique de l’identité [Us and the Others: The Problematic of Identity]. Krisis. ISBN 2916916008
12. Drinóczi, T. (2020). Constitutional identity in Europe: The identity of the constitution. A regional approach. In German Law Journal, 21(2), pp. 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.1
13. European Communities. (2007). Declaration on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Treaties of Rome. Retrieved from http://www.europa.eu/50/docs/berlin_declaration_en.pdf.
14. Giuliani, D. J. (2007). Understanding the European Council in Lisbon and the Reform Treaty. European Issues, (76), pp. 1–5. Foundation Robert Schuman.
15. Hamuľák, O., Kopal, D., & Kerikmäe, T. (2017). Identite nationale et constitutionnelle dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne [National and Constitutional Identity in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union]. In Bratislava Law Review, 1(2), pp. 6–27. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2017.1.2
16. Kelemen, D. R., & Pech, L. (2019). The uses and abuses of constitutional pluralism: Undermining the rule of law in the name of constitutional identity in Hungary and Poland. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 21, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2019.11
17. Kiššová, S. (2021). Koncept národnej identity v práve EÚ: tichá zbraň euroskepticizmu? [The National Identity Caluse in EU Law: A Silent Weapon of Euroscepticism?] In Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae, 40(2), pp. 110–128.
18. Kiššová, S. (2022a). An overview of the doctrine of ultra vires from the perspective of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Polish Constitutional Court. In Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law, 2, pp. 33–48. https://doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2022.2.330.
19. Kiššová, S. (2022b). Thirty years of the concept of national identity in the primary law of the European Union: Clearly unclear? In Balkan Social Science Review, 20, pp. 137–158.
20. Kiššová, S. (2023). The EU competence in criminal law and national identity as an opt-out for the Member States of the European Union. In Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law, 3, pp. 9–22. https://doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2023.3.810.
21. Konstadinides, T. (2013a). Constitutional identity as a shield and as a sword: The European legal order within the framework of national constitutional settlement. In Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 15, pp. 195–218, https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712801753031.
22. Konstadinides, T. (2013b). The constitutionalisation of national identity in EU law and its implications. In SSRN Papers. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712801753031.
23. Lenaerts, K., & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. (2013). To say what the law of the EU is: Methods of interpretation and the European Court of Justice (EUI AEL Distinguished Lecture, 2013/09). Academy of European Law. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/28339.
24. Llivina, A. C. (2014). Identity and diversity in EU law: Contextualising Article 4(2) TEU [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra]. Barcelona.
25. Loth, W. (2013). Negotiating Maastricht Treaty. Journal of European Integration History, 19(1), pp. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9511-2013-1
26. Luxembourg Presidency. (2005). Jean-Claude Juncker states that there will be a period for reflection and discussion, but the process of ratifying the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe will continue without further renegotiations [Press release] [cit. 30 July 2025] Retrieved from http://www.eu2005.lu/en/actualites/communiques/2005/06/16jclj-ratif/index.html.
27. Molinier, J. (2005). Les principes fondateurs de l’Union européenne [The Foundational Principles of the European Union]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France - Droit et justice. ISBN 978-2-13-054785-3.
28. Noël, E. (2025). Traité de Maastricht: Conférence intergouvernementale sur l’Union politique [The Maastricht Treaty: Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union]. [Online archival material] [cit. 19 August 2025] Historical Archives of the European Union. Retrieved from https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/114601?item=EN-526.
29. Patakyová, M. T., Beleš, A., Blažo, O., Kováčiková, H., Kiššová, S., Máčaj, A., & Nosa, M. (2025). Právo EÚ. Inštitucionálny systém a systém práva [EU Law: The Institutional System and the Legal Order]. Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-80-571-0752-1.
30. Piris, J. C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty: A legal and political analysis (Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521197922
31. Schnettger, A. (2019). Article 4(2) TEU as a vehicle for national constitutional identity in the shared European legal system. In C. Calliess & G. van der Schyff (Eds.), Constitutional identity in a Europe of multilevel constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, pp. 9 – 38.
32. Von Bogdandy, A., & Schill, S. (2010). Die Achtung der nationalen Identität unter dem reformierten Unionsvertrag: Zur unionsrechtlichen Rolle nationalen Verfassungsrechts und zur Überwindung des absoluten Vorrangs [Respect for National Identity under the Reformed Union Treaty: On the Role of National Constitutional Law in EU Law and on Overcoming the Principle of Absolute Primacy]. In Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV), 70, pp. 701–734.
33. Von Bogdandy, A., & Schill, S. (2011). Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty. In Common Market Law Review, 48, pp. 1417–1453.
34. Working Group V (2002a). Final Report of Working Group V “Complementary Competences” (CONV 375/1/02 – REV 1, WG V 14). Brussels: European Convention Secretariat. [cit. 25 August 2025] Retrieved from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/CV-375-2002-REV-1/en/pdf.
35. Working Group V (2002b). Paper by Mr. Joachim Wuermeling (Member of the Convention, European Parliament) on the question paper distributed by Mr. Christophersen in WG V (Working Document 24, WGV-WD 24 EN). Brussels.
Other sources:
1. Alkotmánybíróság, Judgement of 20 December 2021. 32/2021. (XII.20.) AB határozat [Decision No. 32/2021 (XII.20.) AB].
2. Annex I to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council meeting in Laeken, Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, 14–15 December 2001, SN 300/1/01 REV 1.
3. BVerfG, Judgment of 14 January 2014, 2 BvR 2728/13
4. BVerfG, Judgment of 22 October 1986, 2 BvR 197/83.
5. BVerfG, Judgment of 29 May 1974, Case 2 BvL 52/71.
6. BVerfG, Judgment of 30 June 2009, 2 BvE 2/08.
7. BVerfG, Judgment of 5 May 2020 , 2 BvR 859/15
8. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, OJ C 326, 26 October 2012
9. Corte costituzionale, Judgment of 13–21 April 1989, No. 232/1989.
10. Corte costituzionale, Judgment of 18 December 1973, No. 183/1973.
11. Corte costituzionale, Judgment of 22 October 1975, No. 232/1975.
12. Corte costituzionale, Judgment of 5 June 1984, No. 170/1984.
13. Draft Treaty amending the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community with a view to achieving Economic and Monetary Union, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 2/91.
14. European Union. (1992). Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty). Official Journal of the European Communities, C 191, 1-112
15. European Union. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 340, 1-144.
16. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 27 November 2012, Thomas Pringle v Government of Ireland and Others, Case C-370/12, EU:C:2012:756.
17. Judgement of the General Court of 6 September 2011, Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council, EU:T:2011:419.
18. Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 July 1996, Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Case C-473/93, ECLI:EU:C:1996:263.
19. Official text from the Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, OJ C 310, 16 December 2004.
20. Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 January 2013 in Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council, Case C 583/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:2.
21. Opinion of Advocate General Mayras delivered on 28 May 1974 in Reyners v Belgium, Case 2/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:59
22. Projet de traité sur l'Union de la présidence luxembourgeoise [Draft Treaty on the Union by the Luxembourg Presidency] [Draft Treaty]. (1991, June 18). Luxembourg. [cit. 30 June 2025] Retrieved from https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/projet_de_traite_sur_l_union_de_la_presidence_luxembourgeoise_luxembourg_18_juin_1991-fr-dbebd2a6-a860-4915-8edf-0a228ecde976.html
23. Projet de traité vers l'Union européenne de la présidence néerlandaise [Draft Treaty Towards the European Union by the Dutch Presidency] [Draft Treaty]. (1991, September 24). Maastricht. [cit. 30 June 2025] Retrieved from https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/projet_de_traite_vers_l_union_europeenne_de_la_presidence_neerlandaise_maastricht_24_septembre_1991-fr-d39ea094-caef-4bab-a345-f8ba104bb740.html
24. Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Judgment of 11 May 2005, case no. K 18/04.
25. Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Judgment of 14 July 2021, case no. P 7/20.
26. Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Judgment of 24 November 2010, case no. K 32/09.
27. Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Judgment of 7 October 2021, case no. K 3/21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Permissions
Authors are expected to obtain permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. BSSR will not be held accountable for any copyright infringement caused by the authors.
Copyright
The content offered in the BSSR remains the intellectual property of the authors and their publishers respectively. University “Goce Delcev”- Shtip, R. Macedonia and BSSR keap the right to promote and re-publish the texts.
