Some Restorative Justice Benefits to Offenders and Victims of Crime
Abstract
The challenges of restorative justice produce a range benefits to offenders and victims of crime. It seems that the best way to understand the pros and cons of implementing a certain program is to analyze and to evaluate the results within a certain time period. There are several objectives, which are used to measure the results of restorative justice. These include the following: the offender accepts responsibility for the crime; the offender faces and apologizes to the victim; the victim participates actively in dealing with the crime; the victim achieves adequate reparation and emotional healing; the disturbed relationship is re-established with harmony and balance. These goals pose a different position for the offender and the victim in the framework of restorative justice, as compared to court trials. The two people are active participants and stakeholders in dealing with the crime. They are their own judges and decision-makers as to how to resolve issues arising from the criminal act in the interests of both sides. Thus, restorative justice encourages and motivates them to take responsibility for their own conflict, the offender as to the illegality of his action and the victim as to a responsibility to protect himself in the future.
Bearing in mind that restorative justice is a different, nontraditional response to crime, due to its informal, human and nonviolent way of dealing with crime, it produces certain benefits to offenders and victims that are main subject in this work.
Key words: restorative justice, offender, victim, reconciliation, crime
Downloads
References
Ashworth, A. (2002) “Responsibility, rights and restorative justice”, British Journal of Criminology 42, р. 582
Barton, C. (2001) “Empowerment and retribution in criminal and restorative justice”, VOMA publication, retrieved 30.05.2013 http://www.voma.org/docs/barton_emp&re.pdf, р. 17
Barton, C. (2001) “Theories of restorative justice”, VOMA publication, retrieved 20.06.2013 http://www.voma.org/docs/barton_trj.pdf, р. 6
Braithwaite, J. (1996) “Restorative justice and a better future”, retrieved 10.05.2013 http://iirp.org/library/braithwaite.html.
Braithwaite, J. (1999) “Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts”, in It Tony, M. (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 25, р. 44
Braithwaite, J. (2001) “Restorative Justice and a New Criminal Law of Substance Abuse”, Youth and Society, 33(2), р. 231
Braithwaite, J. (2002) “Setting standards for restorative justice”, British Journal of Criminology 42 (3), р. 567
Braithwaite, J. (2005) “Between proportionality & impunity: confrontation-truth-prevention” The American Society of Criminology 2004 Sutherland Address", Criminology, 43(2), р. 292
Braithwaite, J. (2006) “Narrative and “Compulsory Compassion”, Law and Social Inquiry, 31(2), retrieved 15.05.2013 http://www.anu.edu.au/fellows/jbraithwaite/pubsbysubject/restorativejustice/index.php.
Christie, N. (1977) “Conflicts as property”, The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 17 No1.
Davis, G. (1992) Making amends: mediation and reparation in Criminal Justice, Routledge, London.
Johnstone, G. (2002) Restorative Justice – ideas, values, debates, Devon, William Publishing.
Khan Shaneela (2005) Mediation in the Criminal System: An improved model for Justicehttp://voma.org/docs/VORP%20for%20sex%20crimes.pdf. , retrieved 13.06.2013
Marshall, T. (1999) Restorative justice – an overwiew, Home Office, England, р. 22
Masters, G. & Warner, R. Ann (1999). Family Group Conferencing for Victims, Offenders and Communities, Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation, School of social work, University of Minnesota.
Mirceva, S., Stefanovska, V. & Gogov, B. (2014). Victim-Offender Mediation and observance of procedural Rights in the Macedonian Justice for Children System: Competitive or Balancing?, Conference proceedings Criminal Justice and security in Central and Eastern Europe “Understanding professionalism, trust and legitimacy”, Ljubljana, Slovenia 15-17 September, Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security-Ljubljana.
Schmid, J. Donald (2001) “Restorative Justice in New Zealand: A Model For U.S. Criminal Justice”, Wellington, New Zealand, retrieved 18.08.2013 at http://www.fulbright.org.nz/voices/axford/docs/schmidd.pdf.
Sered, D. (2006) Mature Justice: Developing Restorative Practices for Serious Young Offenders, Paper presented at the International Institute of Restorative Practices “The Next Step: Developing Restorative Communities”, October 18-20, 2006, Bethlehem, PA
Stefanovska, V. (2013) New challenges and perspectives of restorative justice, Balkan social science Review, Vol.2, 2013, University Goce Delcev – Stip, p. 47-62.
Wynne, J. (1996) “Leeds mediation and reparation services: Ten years experience with victim-offender mediation”, Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, USA.
Recommendation No. R. (99) 19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning mediation in penal matters, Council of Europe
Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing recommendation concerning mediation in penal matters, CEPEJ (2007) 13, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice
Permissions
Authors are expected to obtain permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. BSSR will not be held accountable for any copyright infringement caused by the authors.
Copyright
The content offered in the BSSR remains the intellectual property of the authors and their publishers respectively. University “Goce Delcev”- Shtip, R. Macedonia and BSSR keap the right to promote and re-publish the texts.
