OTHERNESS AND GENDER PERFORMATIVITY IN JOYCE’S DUBLINERS AND ULYSSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/Keywords:
Joyce; feminist literary theory; gender performativity; otherness.Abstract
This paper examines the construction of women as the “other” in James Joyce’s Dubliners and Ulysses through a feminist theoretical lens, employing a close reading of selected women characters, including Eveline, Maria, Gretta Conroy, Mrs. Mooney, Gerty MacDowell, and Molly Bloom. By analyzing pivotal narrative moments such as Eveline’s paralysis at the dock, Maria’s disrupted rituals, Gretta’s emotional silence, Mrs. Mooney’s tactical manipulation of gender norms, Gerty’s self-objectification, and Molly’s embodied monologue, the paper illustrates how Joyce both reflects and subverts early twentieth-century patriarchal norms. Women’s identity is shown to be performatively constructed and narratively constrained, yet occasionally resisting these limits through fragmented acts of agency. Irigaray’s notion of woman as the supporting “mirror” to man clarifies the structural marginalization of these characters, while Butler’s emphasis on repetition and performativity exposes the instability of gender roles in Joyce’s texts. The study also engages with recent feminist literary criticism that re-evaluates Joyce’s work in light of contemporary concerns, foregrounding voice, embodiment, and shifting models of women’s subjectivity, while also addressing the intersection of gender and class through insights from material feminism and social reproduction theory. Ultimately, Joyce’s fiction is shown to participate in a complex negotiation of gendered identity, revealing both the constraints of patriarchal narrative and the latent potential for feminist disruption.
Downloads
References
Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Indiana University Press.
Attridge, D., & Howes, M. (Eds.). (2000). Semicolonial Joyce. Cambridge University Press.
Boheemen, C. van. (1987). The novel as family romance: Language, gender, and authority from Fielding to Joyce. Cornell University Press.
Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Callow, H. C. (1992). Joyce’s female voices in “Ulysses”. The Journal of Narrative Technique, 22(3), 151–163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30225365
Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa (K. Cohen & P. Cohen, Trans.). Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
DuPlessis, R. B. (1985). Writing beyond the ending: Narrative strategies of twentieth-century women writers. Indiana University Press.
Estévez-Saá, M. (2024). 100 years of James Joyce’s women: Wife, daughter and friend. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(6), 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2326938
Fraser, N. (2016). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso.
Freud, S. (1957). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love (J. Strachey, Trans.). In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 11, pp. 177–190). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1912)
Friedman, S. S. (1998). Mappings: Feminism and the cultural geographies of encounter. Princeton University Press.
Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898
Irigaray, L. (1985a). Speculum of the other woman. Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1974)
Irigaray, L. (1985b). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1977)
Joyce, J. (2003). Dubliners (M. Traynor, Ed.). Wordsworth Editions.
Joyce, J. (n.d.). Ulysses [PDF eBook]. Planet PDF.
Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. Methuen.
O’Brien, A. J. (2000). The Molly Blooms of “Penelope”: Reading Joyce Archivally. Journal of Modern Literature, 24(1), 7–24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3831697
Vogel, L. (2013). Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a unitary theory. Haymarket Books.
