FROM CLASSICAL TQM TO DIGITAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT:THE IMPACT OF AUTOMATION AND INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES ON QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN MACEDONIAN COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/Keywords:
Total Quality Management (TQM); digitalization; Industry 4.0; key performance indicators (KPIs); operational efficiency; competitiveness.Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the transformation of Total Quality Management (TQM) practices under conditions of digitalization, automation, and Industry 4.0, with a specific focus on their impact on organizational quality performance, operational efficiency, and competitiveness in Macedonian companies.
The study employs a mixed-methods research design, integrating quantitative survey research, structured interviews with managers and quality professionals, and an empirical analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs), including quality level, defect rate, process efficiency, and operational performance. The sample includes companies with different levels of digital maturity, enabling a comparative assessment of traditional and digitally enhanced TQM practices within a dynamic business environment.
The findings indicate that digitalization significantly improves the effectiveness of TQM by enabling real-time data collection, enhanced process monitoring, predictive quality control, and data-driven decision-making. Companies with higher levels of digital maturity demonstrate superior quality outcomes, reduced defect rates, and improved operational efficiency. However, the results also identify key challenges in the digital transformation of TQM, including organizational resistance to change, insufficient employee digital skills, and partial or fragmented integration of advanced technologies into existing quality management systems.
The research is limited by its focus on a single national context and a relatively constrained sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Future research could extend the analysis to other countries, industries, or longitudinal datasets to further explore the long-term effects of digital TQM transformation.
The study offers practical insights for managers and decision-makers on how to modernize TQM through digital technologies, supporting continuous improvement, more efficient resource utilization, and sustainable quality performance.
Digitally enabled TQM contributes to sustainable business practices, improved working conditions, enhanced employee involvement, and greater stakeholder satisfaction.
This paper provides original empirical evidence on the integration of TQM and digitalization in a developing economy, emphasizing the role of digital maturity and KPI-based evaluation in achieving sustainable quality and competitive advantage.
References
1. Bonekamp, L., & Sure, M. (2015). Consequences of Industry 4.0 on human labour and work organization. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 6(1), 33–44.
2. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
3. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
4. Fonseca, L. M., Domingues, J. P., Machado, P. B., & Harder, D. (2018). Total quality management, sustainable performance and Industry 4.0: An empirical study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9), 1683–1700. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2017-0062
5. Juran, J. M. (1992). Juran on quality by design: The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. Free Press.
6. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group. Forschungsunion.
7. Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00004-4
8. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
9. Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034
10. Mitreva, E. (2011). Model-integral methodology for successful designing and implementing of TQM system in Macedonian companies. International Journal for Quality Research, 5(4), 255-260.
11. Mitreva, E., & Filiposki, O. (2012). Proposal methodology of the subsystem-internal standardization as part of TQM system. International Journal for Quality Research, 6(3), 251-258.
12. Mitreva, E., Cvetkovik, D., Filiposki, O., Taskov, N., & Gjorshevski, H. (2016). The Effects of Total Quality Management Practices on Performance within a Company for Frozen Food in the Republic of Macedonia. Tem Journal, 5(3), 339.
13. Mitreva, E., Taskov, N., Filiposki, O., Lazarevski, I., Srebrenkoska, V., & Gjorshevski, H. (2017). Measuring the Business Results in the Macedonian Companies. TEM Journal, 6(3), 558.
14. Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total quality management and operational excellence: Text with cases (4th ed.). Routledge.
15. Psomas, E., & Jaca, C. (2016). Total quality management critical factors and results in European organizations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(1–2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.986176
16. Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., ten Hompel, M., & Wahlster, W. (2017). Industrie 4.0 maturity index: Managing the digital transformation of companies. Herbert Utz Verlag.
17. Sony, M., Nagendra, A., & Naik, R. (2020). Digitalization of total quality management (TQM) and its impact on organizational performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(6), 1883–1904. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2019-0025
18. Tortorella, G. L., Giglio, R., & van Dun, D. H. (2021). Industry 4.0 adoption as a facilitator for lean manufacturing implementation. International Journal of Production Research, 59(8), 2464–2482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1844330
19. Zhong, R., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015
