DTC-SBTC MODEL: OPTIMAL POLICIES, WAGE PREMIUM AND CREDIT RATIONING

Authors

  • Dushko Josheski Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia
  • Natasha Miteva Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia
  • Tatjana Boshkov Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46763/

Keywords:

Directed Technological change, Skill-Biased Technical Change, Wage inequality, Credit rationing, Carbon Taxes, Clean Subsidies

Abstract

In this paper: Financial frictions distort the direction of technical change, credit rationing plus wage premium jointly determines direction of innovation, credit policy is more powerful than subsidies alone. In skill premium vs skill ratio analysis there are multiple equilibria and the dominant stand here is that: Non-monotonic skill demand generates multiple steady states. Multiple equilibria with wage premium and financial frictions there are indeed multiple equilibria but not all of them are stable. And in the skill premium vs skill ratio analysis there are more stable equilibria. Ramsey-Mirrlees-Pigou in DTC-SBTC model analysis showed that taxes (environmental and income) are decreasing skill premium while clean subsidies are increasing inequality. Effect of carbon taxes is ambiguous and optimal subsidy: higher carbon tax lowers optimal clean subsidy, higher financial frictions or worse credit conditions, lower optimal clean subsidy, effects of social preferences are ambiguous. If clean sector creates more jobs government may increase subsidies, if subsidies may benefit skilled workers or capital owners, government may reduce subsidies to limit inequality. Policy tools interact, taxes substitute subsidies, credit frictions weaken them, and inequality reshapes them​.

References

1. Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). (1972). Hyperbolic functions. In Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (9th printing, pp. 83–86). Dover.

2. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Hémous, D. (2014). The environment and directed technical change in a North—South model. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 513–530. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43664661

3. Acemoglu, D., Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Localised and biased technologies: Atkinson and Stiglitz’s new view, induced innovations, and directed technological change.

4. Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion, Leonardo Bursztyn, and David Hemous. (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change. American Economic Review 102 (1): 131–66.

5. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599

6. Ahmad, S. (1966). On the theory of induced invention, Economic Journal, vol. 76, pp. 344–57

7. Allen, R. G. D. (1968). Macro-economic Theory: A Mathematical Treatment. London: Macmillan. p. 35.

8. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1169-1213.

9. Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1334.

10. Berman, E., Bound, J., & Machin, S. (1998). Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1245-1279.

11. Blackorby, C., C. A. Knox Lovell, & Thursby, M. C. (1976). Extended Hicks Neutral Technical Change. The Economic Journal, 86(344), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231457

12. Blanchard, P., Devaney, R. L., & Hall, G. R. (2010). Differential equations (4th ed.). Brooks-Cole.

13. Blanchard, P.; Devaney, R. L.; Hall, G. R. (2006). Differential Equations. London: Thompson. pp. 96–111. ISBN 978-0-495-01265-8.

14. Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002). Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 733–783. doi.org

15. Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831401

16. Drandakis, E. M., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). A Model of Induced Invention, Growth and Distribution. The Economic Journal, 76(304), 823–840. https://doi.org/10.2307/2229086

17. Durmaz, T., & Schroyen, F. (2020). Evaluating carbon capture and storage in a climate model with endogenous technical change. Climate Change Economics, 11(01), 2050003.

18. Greaker, M., Heggedal, T. R., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2018). Environmental policy and the direction of technical change. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1100–1138. doi.org

19. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality Ladders and Product Cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 557–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937947

20. Guiso, L. (1998). High-tech firms and credit rationing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(1), 39–59. doi.org

21. Hémous, D., & Olsen, M. (2021). Directed technical change in labor and environmental economics.Annual Review of Economics, 13, 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092120-044327

22. Hicks J. (1932). The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan

23. Hicks, J. R. (1963). The Theory of Wages. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00189-7

24. Houthakker, H. S. (1955). The Pareto distribution and the Cobb-Douglas production function in activity analysis. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(1), 27–31

25. Jones, Charles. (2005). The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 120. 517-549. 10.1093/qje/120.2.517.

26. Juhn, C., Murphy, K. M., & Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 410-442

27. Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118323

28. Kennedy, C. (1964). Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. The Economic Journal, 74(295), 541–547. doi.org

29. Krusell, P., Ohanian, L. E., Ríos-Rull, J.-V., & Violante, G. L. (2000). Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Econometrica, 68(5), 1029–1053. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2999442

30. Lemoine, D. (2017). Innovation-led transitions in energy supply (Working Paper No. 23445). National Bureau of Economic Research. doi.org

31. Liu, L. (2011). The Alchian–Allen theorem and the law of relative demand: The case of multiple quality-differentiable brands. Mathematical Social Sciences, 61(1), 52–57. doi.org

32. Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimal income taxation. Review of Economic Studies,38, 175–208.

33. Papageorgiou, C., Saam, M., & Schulte, P. (2017). Substitution between clean and dirty energy inputs: A macroeconomic perspective. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 281–290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26616117

34. Parro, Fernando. (2013). Capital-Skill Complementarity and the Skill Premium in a Quantitative Model of Trade. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5 (2): 72–117.

35. Pi, J., & Zhang, P. (2018). Skill-biased technological change and wage inequality in developing countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 56, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.11.004

36. Pigou, A.C. (2020) (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230249318.

37. Pigou,A.C.(1932). The Economics of Welfare (4th ed.) (London: Macmillan, 1932).

38. Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation. The Economic Journal, 37(145), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2222721

39. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632

40. Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225-243

41. Samuelson, P. A. (1965). A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weisäcker Lines. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927763

42. Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 312-320.

43. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1802787

44. Suh, S., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Covered interest parity and arbitrage paradox in emerging markets: Evidence from the Korean market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 38, 161–176. doi.org

45. Violante, Giovanni. (2008). Skill-Biased Technical Change. 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2388-1.

46. Wiskich, A. (2024). A carbon tax versus clean subsidies: Optimal and suboptimal policies for the clean transition. Energy Economics, 132, 107410. doi.org

Downloads

Published

01.08.2026