APPLICATION OF STANDARDS-BASED ASSESSMENT FOR CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS DURING LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Abstract
Critical thinking, a fundamental cognitive process, is recognized as pivotal across various domains of human endeavor. Employers prioritize this competency due to its indispensable role in comprehending challenges, exploring opportunities, and making informed decisions within contemporary competitive environments. Consequently, this study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to underscore the necessity of integrating standards-based assessment methodologies to evaluate critical thinking skills within language acquisition. Emphasizing this imperative during curriculum design and implementation is crucial, necessitating delineating effective strategies to incentivize students to enhance these proficiencies. As seasoned educators, we recognize the profound significance and applicability of critical thinking across disciplines, hence integrating activities to foster diverse facets of critical thinking within our instructional frameworks. This paper presents the outcomes of analyzing standards-based assessments about critical thinking skills in the domain of the Macedonian language for professional purposes during the academic year 2022/2023 at the South East European University in the Republic of Macedonia. Mastery of these skills is imperative for students to grasp the conceptual underpinnings of their academic pursuits, thereby equipping them for their forthcoming professional endeavors. However, educators consistently grapple with students' deficiencies in these competencies, with fostering critical thinking emerging as a primary pedagogical challenge. Our research findings affirm a significant correlation that is heightened awareness among students regarding the significance of critical thinking correlates positively with increased dedication toward solving pertinent tasks conducive to advancing these cognitive abilities.
Keywords: critical thinking skills; standards-based assessment; language acquisition; Macedonian language.
Downloads
References
2. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure: Why governments must learn to think differently. London, Demos.
3. Dobelli, R. (2013). The Art of Thinking (1st ed.). HarperCollins.
4. Dwyer, C., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2011). The promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping. In C. P. Horvath & J. M. Forte (Eds.), Critical thinking (pp. 97-122). Nova Science Publisher.
5. Dzogovic, S. A., & Bajrami, V. (2023). Qualitative Research Methods in Science and Higher Education. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 13(1), 156-166.
6. Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. In Teaching for Higher Order Thinking, 32(3), 179-186.
7. Ellis, T. J. (2001). Multimedia enhanced educational products as a tool to promote critical thinking in adult students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(3), 107-124.
8. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assesment. Retrieved from www.insightassessment.com
9. Fisher, A. (2011). Critical Thinking: An Introduction (second edition). Cambridge University Press.
10. Haber, J. (2020). Critical Thinking. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series.
11. Horvath, C. P., & Forte, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Critical thinking. Nova Science Publishers.
12. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Paul, R. (1995). The four domains of critical thinking. In J. Willsen & A. J. A. Binker (Eds.), Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world (pp. 123-132). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
14. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved June 01, 2024, from https://www.criticalthinking.org
15. Roberts-Cady, S. (2008). The role of critical thinking in academic dishonesty policies. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 60-66.
16. Sieglová, D. (2017). Critical thinking for language learning and teaching: Methods for the 21st century. Proceedings of the Cross-Cultural Business Conference 2017. University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of Management, Campus Steyr.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315697174_Critical_Thinking_for_Language_Learning_and_Teaching_Methods_for_the_21st_Century
17. Taneska, P. A., & Zdravkovska-Adamova, B. (2018). Creating syllabus and developing grading criteria for Macedonian language for professional purposes at SEEU according to needs based analysis. Journal of Teaching and Education.
18. Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
19. Yang, S. C., & Chun, T. (2009). Experimental study of teaching critical thinking in civic education in Taiwanese junior high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
20. Zdravkovska-Adamova, B., & Taneska, P. A. (2020). Development of critical thinking skills for Macedonian language for professional purposes 2 during the online teaching period. SEEU Review, 15(1), Challenges and Perspectives of COVID–19.
