Teachers' assessments of certain curricular determinants in primary school

  • Milan Matijević
  • Siniša Opić
  • Goran Lapat

Abstract

There is a clear prevalence of equipment and spatial arrangements for traditional teaching from thefront of the class in Croatian classrooms. During such instruction, pupils mostly sit, listen and watch. Further, itis evident that primary school classrooms feature several elements pointing to the use of constructivistdidactics, and include attempts at adjusting the space and equipment to the developmental needs of pupils inmiddle childhood. A research team called “School and Classes for the Net Generation” organised severalexaminations of the assessments of curricular determinants in Croatian primary and secondary schools.The aim of this study is to examine the assessments of changes that happen in school and in classes(or those that could happen) under the influence of new didactic understandings and digital educationtechnology. A specifically constructed questionnaire was used on a sample of primary education male andfemale teachers (N=214), which is representative for Central Croatia, since the data were collected throughindividual surveys in schools located in the City of Zagreb and in eight counties. The questionnaire contained50 statements that the respondents had to assess on a Likert-type scale. In this paper, we shall present onlypart of the results relating to the pedagogical and curricular characteristics of the teaching methods anddidactics of primary education. Differences in assessments were tested in terms of the working experience ofprimary education teachers.Primary education teachers recognise the characteristics of constructivist didactics and moderndevelopments in the theory of education and the theory of school quite well. Most agree that it is important toorganise classes in which the pupils are more active than the teacher, and that any curriculum is regarded asimplemented if pupils are actually active. Most respondents hold that classic textbooks will soon be replaced bymodern digital multimedia sources of knowledge. Teachers agree that all pupils should be provided with anopportunity to exercise their abilities in the best possible way, bearing in mind that everyone has differenttalents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baert, G., Galton, M., Honeth, P., Sivirine, J.M. Thurler, M. (2002). Innovations in Primary Education (Prijevod s francuskog na hrvatski jezik: orig. L’innovation dans l’enseignement primaire). Zagreb: Školske novine.

Bruner, J. (1999). Process of Education. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

Dorph, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., Hartry, A., McCaffrey, T. (2011). High hopes–few opportunities: The status of elementary science education in California. Sacramento, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd.

Doyle, T. (2008). Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Eichelberger, H., Laner, Ch., Kohlberg, W. D. und Stary, Ch. (2008). Reformpädagogik goes elearning: Neue Wege zur Selbstbestimmung von virtuellem Wissenstransfer und individualisiertem Wissenserwerb. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

Gatto, J. T. (2009), Weapons of mass instruction. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers (translated into Croatian 2009: Oružja za masovna poučavanja). Zagreb: Algoritam.

Herrmann, U. (Hrsg.). (2009). Neurodidaktik: Grundlagen und Vorschläge für gehirngerechtes Lehren und Lernen. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.

Kerres, M. (2013). Mediendidaktik: Konzepten und Entwicklung mediengestützter Lernangebote (4. Auflage). München: Pldenburg Verlag.

Liessmann, K. P. (2006). Theorie der Unbildung. Wien: Paul Zsolnay Verlag. (translated into Croatian 2001: Teorija neobrazovanosti). Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk).

Lu, Ch., Tsai, CH. & Hong, J. (2008). Use root cause analysis teaching strategy to train primary pre-service science teachers. US- China Education Review, 5(12).47-53.

Reece, J. and Walker, S. (2011). Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide. Durham: Business Education Publishers Limited.

Reich, L. (2006). Konstruktivistische Didaktik. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Terhart, E. (2003). Constructivism and teaching: a new paradigm in general didactics? Journal of Curriculum Studies 35(1): 25-44.

Thomas, G. (2015). Education: A Very Short Introduction (translated into Croatian: Kratak uvod u pedagogiju). Zagreb: Educa.

Published
2016-06-14