Evaluation of Some Cherry Tomato Genotypes and Determination of Their Ability for In Vitro Micropropagation
AbstractCherry tomato is a variety that is poorly present at our fields, mainly due tothe traditional habits of the consumers and the commercial tomato producers togrow tomato varieties with large fruit. Cherry tomato - Lycopersicon esculentumMill. var. cerasiforme (Dunal) is a tomato variety with small fruit, but can havedifferent shapes and colors, and it is used mainly for fresh consumption. Thefeatures of this variety are portrayed by its sweetness and aroma, which furtherenriche the taste of food. During this research, a comparative analysis of themorphological traits in this type of tomato in outdoor production conditions,as well as in protected environment was performed. The possibilities forproduction and maintenance in plant cell culture were researched as well,with a goal of improving the morphological and biological features of cherrytomato.
Caliman, F., & Silva, D. (2010). Quality of tomatoes grown under a protecte environment and field conditions. IDESIA (Chile), 75–82.
Chaudhry Z, Habib D, Rshid H, Qurashi AS (2004). Regeneration from various explants of in vitro seeding of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L., cv. Roma). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 7: 269-272
Carli, P., Barone, A., Fogliano, V., Frusciante, L., & Ercolano, M. R. (2011). Dissection of genetic and environmental factors involved in tomato organoleptic quality. BMC plant biology, 11(1), 58.
Davis, D.G., K.A. Breiland, D. Frear and G.A. Sandsecor. (1994). Callus initiation of regeneration of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.) cultivars with different sensitivities to metribuzin Dubois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and F.
Smith. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances.
Anal. Chem. 28:350-356.
FAO Stat (2012): FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, statistical database http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/en/
Државен завод за статистика на Република Македонија. (2011): Македонија во бројки, Скопје, стр. 1-79 (36).
He Y, Zhang Y, Pereira AG, Antihus HG, and Wang J (2005). Nondestructive Determination of Tomato Fruit Quality Characteristics Using Vis/NIR Spectroscopy Technique. Int. J. Info. Technol. Vol. 11 No: 11.
He, Y., Zhang, Y., Pereira, A. G., Gómez, A. H., & Wang, J. (2005). Nondestructive Determination of Tomato Fruit Quality Characteristics Using Vis / NIR Spectroscopy Technique. Journal of Information Technology, 11(11), 97–108.
IPGRI. (1996): Descriptors for Tomato (Lycopersicon spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 47.
Jatoi, S.A., M. Munir and G.M. Sajid, (1997). Shoot regeneration and callogenetic potentials of hypocotyl of tomato hybrids to different plant growth regulator levels. Sci. Khyber, 10: 41-46.
Jongen W (2002). Fruit and vegetables processing. Wood head publishing in food sci. and technol. Wagenningen University, Netherlands, 350 pp.
Колева-Гудева Л., Трајкова Ф., Златковски В. (2008): Биотехнологија и биодиверзитет: Аспекти на подобрување на генетските ресурси на земјоделските култури. Годишен зборник на Институт за јужни земјоделски култури, Струмица, Вол 8: 57-66.
Колева-Гудева Л., Трајкова Ф. (2010) Производствени карактеристики на црешовиден домат Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Var. cerasiforme (Dunal) во струмичкиот регион. Годишен зборник на Земјоделскиот
факултет, Универзитет „Гоце Делчев“-Штип,10, 35-44
Maluf WR, Miranda JEC, Ferreira-Rossi PE (1989). Genetic analysis of components of fruit size and shape in a diallel cross of tomato cultivars. Brazil. J. Genetics. 12(4): 819-831
Malundo T. M. M., Shewfelt R.L., Scott, J. W. (1995) Flavor quality of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biol Tec, 6:103-110.
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiol. Plant 15:473-497.
Paran, I. and E. van der Knaap. (2007). Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J. Expt.Bot. 58:3841–3852.
Petersen K.K., Willumsen J., Kaack, K. (1998). Composition and taste of tomatoes as affected by increased salinity and different salinity sources. J Hortic Sci Biotech, 73:205-215.
Petro-Turzа M (1987). Flavor of tomato and tomato products. Food Rev. Int. 2(3): 309-351.
Reséndez AM, Aguilar FJL, Viramontes UF, Dimas NR, Arroyo JV, Carrillo JLR, Ríos PC, Valdés MHR (2012). Tomato production in sand: vermicompost mixtures compared with sand and nutritive solution. J.Agric. Sci. Rev. 1:19-26.
Sakiyama, R. (1966). Changes in the acid contents of tomato fruits during development. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 35:36-39.
Stevens, M.A. (1972). Citrate and malate concentration in tomato fruits:Genetic control and maturational effects. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:655-668.
Thybo, A. K., Edelenbos, M., Christensen, L. P., Sørensen, J. N., & Thorup-Kristensen, K. (2006). Effect of organic growing systems on sensory quality and chemical composition of tomatoes. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 39, 835–843.
Turhan, A. (2009). Estimation of certain chemical constituents of fruits of selected tomato genotypes grown in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(10), 1086–1092.
Warnock SJ (1990) Observations on factors affecting the intensity of pear-shape in tomato fruit. Tomato Genetics Cooperative 41:64.