EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF CHICKEN MEAT

Authors

  • Nadica Bajraktarova
  • Aco Kuzelov
  • Dimitar Nakov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46763/

Keywords:

chicken meat, chemical composition, essential fatty acids, nutritional quality

Abstract

Chicken meat is increasingly recognized as a valuable source of high-quality protein and essential fatty acids, including linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid, which must be obtained from the diet because the human body cannot produce them. This study provides a critical evaluation of the nutritional value of various chicken cuts, including breast, back, drumstick, and thigh, focusing on their chemical composition, physicochemical properties, and fatty acid profiles. Representative samples were collected from retail markets in North Macedonia, handled under controlled hygienic conditions, and analyzed for protein, fat, moisture, ash content, pH, water-binding ability (WBA), color parameters, and fatty acid composition using standardized methods.

Results revealed that chicken breast contains the lowest fat content (2.40 g/100 g) and the highest protein levels (20.95%), along with a favorable ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids. Increased amounts of saturated fatty acids are associated with higher LDL cholesterol. Thigh and back cuts exhibited higher fat content (up to 26.17 g/100 g) but maintained substantial levels of essential fatty acids. Variations in water-binding capacity, pH, and color among cuts were also observed, influencing sensory attributes, juiciness, and technological functionality.

These findings highlight the role of chicken meat as a lean, nutritionally beneficial source of essential fatty acids, supporting cardiovascular health and improved lipid balance. The observed differences among cuts emphasize the importance of selecting specific portions to optimize dietary intake of bioactive fatty acids. From a health perspective, consumption of chicken breast is recommended, while meat from higher-fat cuts should be consumed in moderation.

References

Abdullah, F. (2023). Meat quality and physicochemical properties: Methods and applications. Springer.

Akter, N. (2025). Optimizing poultry performance through innovative nutritional interventions–Dataset.

AOAC. (2019). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (21st ed.). AOAC International.

EN ISO 936:1998. (1998). Meat and meat products — Determination of total ash. European Committee for Standardization / International Organization for Standardization.

Hoa, T. T., Van Ba, H., & Pham, T. T. (2019). Instrumental color measurement of meat products: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56(5), 2341–2353.

ISO 1442:1997. (1997). Meat and meat products — Determination of moisture content (Reference method). International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 2917:1999. (1999). Meat and meat products — Determination of pH. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 5508:1990. (1990). Animal and vegetable fats and oils — Analysis by gas chromatography of methyl esters of fatty acids. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 5509:2000. (2000). Animal and vegetable fats and oils — Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 937:2023. (2023). Meat and meat products — Determination of nitrogen content (Kjeldahl method). International Organization for Standardization.

Liu, Y., Zhang, M., & Li, Q. (2023). Colour attributes and consumer perception of poultry and pork. Meat Science, 195, 109044.

Mir, N. A., Rafiq, A., Kumar, F., Singh, V., & Shukla, V. (2017). Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(10), 2997–3009.

Murata, S. (2025). Descriptive sensory analysis of Japanese Jidori chicken (Choshu-Kurokashiwa) thigh meat: Sensory attributes distinguishing it from broiler chickens. The Journal of Poultry Science, 62, 2025025.

National Statistical Office of North Macedonia. (2024). Production and consumption of meat in North Macedonia (2020–2024). Skopje, North Macedonia.

Pereira, P. C., & Vicente, F. (2022). Meat nutritive value and human health. In New aspects of meat quality (pp. 561–577). Woodhead Publishing.

Pinchen, H., Roe, M., Finglas, P., Berry, R., Church, S., Dodhia, S., & Farron-Wilson, M. (2020). McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset 2020. Public Health England.

Ros-Freixedes, R., Gol, S., Pena, R. N., Tor, M., Estany, J., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2016). Genetic parameters and accuracy of genomic selection for fatty acid composition in Duroc pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48(1), 24.

Scollan, N. D., Hocquette, J. F., Nuernberg, K., Dannenberger, D., Richardson, I., & Moloney, A. P. (2017). Innovations in beef fatty acid composition: Impacts on human health. Animal, 11(5), 652–662.

Vicente, F., & Pereira, A. (2024). Gas chromatography for fatty acid profiling in meat: Recent advances. Food Chemistry, 421, 136712.

Wood, J. D., Richardson, R. I., Nute, G. R., Fisher, A. V., Campo, M. M., Kasapidou, E., … Enser, M. (2004). Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Science, 66(1), 21–32.

Yi, R., Liu, C., Zhang, T., & Li, Y. (2023). Role of bioactive peptides and fatty acids in meat for human health. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 22(4), 2345–2363.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2025

How to Cite

EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF CHICKEN MEAT . (2025). Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences, 23(2), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.46763/

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3