COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BIOACTIVE COMPONENT CONTENT IN TWO VARIETIES OF Humulus lupulus L.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46763/JAPS2624167kKeywords:
bitter acids, hop extracts, phytotherapy, spectrophotometric analysisAbstract
Humulus lupulus L. has gained strong scientific interest due to its rich phytochemical profile and diverse biological activities. Among its bioactive constituents, bitter acids have been extensively investigated for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects, highlighting their potential therapeutic value in the prevention and management of various health conditions. This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of the bioactive component content in two Humulus lupulus L. varieties, Herkules and Aurora, as their chemical composition represents a key determinant of the potential application not only in the brewery industry but also in herbal pharmaceutical products. The experimental analysis was conducted using an internally standardized spectrophotometric (UV/Vis spectrophotometer Cary 60 UV-Vis, Agilent Technologies, USA) and gravimetric method, routinely used as an analytical approach in the brewing industry. Diethyl ether extracts, consequently diluted in methanol, were assessed by measuring UV absorbance at wavelengths of 355 nm, 325 nm, and 275 nm. Absorbance at 355 nm predominantly reflects the presence of α-acids (humulones). Measurements at 325 nm are used to quantify oxidized bitter acid derivatives and related soft resin fractions, while absorbance at 275 nm enables the assessment of phenolic constituents and other resinous compounds that may interfere with the analysis. The combined use of these three wavelengths enables selective and more accurate spectrophotometric determination of α-acids in hop extracts. The content of total resins, soft resins, hard resins was determined gravimetrically. The results revealed differences among the analyzed samples, reflecting variability in their chemical composition, emphasizing differences in the content of bioactive components in the two examined varieties. One of the varieties exhibited a higher concentration of α-acids, suggesting a potentially greater biological activity. In conclusion, the obtained results highlight the importance of cultivar-dependent variations in Humulus lupulus and their implications for both phytotherapeutic and brewing applications. The present findings highlight the importance of improved characterization of the chemical profiles of hop varieties, which may support their targeted utilization and warrant further detailed research into their therapeutic potential and role in rational phytotherapy.
References
Almaguer, C., Schönberger, C., Gastl, M., Arendt, E. K., & Becker, T. (2014). Humulus lupulus–a story that begs to be told. A review. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 120(4), 289-314.
Bertelli, D., Brighenti, V., Marchetti, L., Reik, A., & Pellati, F. (2018). Nuclear magnetic resonance and high-performance liquid chromatography techniques for the characterization of bioactive compounds from Humulus lupulus L. (hop). Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 410(15), 3521-3531.
Bocquet, L., Sahpaz, S., Hilbert, J. L., Rambaud, C., & Riviere, C. H. L. L. (2018). Humulus lupulus L., a very popular beer ingredient and medicinal plant: Overview of its phytochemistry, its bioactivity, and its biotechnology. Phytochemistry reviews, 17(5), 1047-1090.
Dzienisik, M., Marzec, M., & Nowak, I. (2026). Antioxidant constituents of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) as functional raw materials for cosmetic applications. Materials, 19(4), 821.
European Brewery Convention. (1998). Analytica-EBC. Fachverlag Hans Carl.
Gullì, M., Percaccio, E., Di Giacomo, S., & Di Sotto, A. (2022). Novel insights into the immunomodulatory effects of caryophyllane sesquiterpenes: A systematic review of preclinical studies. Applied Sciences, 12(5), 2292.
Hansel, R., & Steinegger, E. (1998). Lehrbuch der Pharmakognosie und Phytopharmazie. Springer-Verlag.
Haunold, A., Nickerson, G. B., Gampert, U., Whitney, P. A., & Hampton, R. O. (1993). Agronomic and quality characteristics of native North American hops. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 51, 133–137.
Iniguez, A. B., & Zhu, M. J. (2021). Hop bioactive compounds in prevention of nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 61(11), 1900–1913.
Karabin, M., Hudcova, T., Jelinek, L., & Dostalek, P. (2016). Biologically active compounds from hops and prospects for their use. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15, 542–567.
Kogut, Ł., Puchalski, C., Jastrzębska, J., & Zaguła, G. (2026). Biological activity of hops (Humulus lupulus L.): Molecular mechanisms and significance for human health—A review. Nutrients, 18(7), 1056.
Leto, L., Favari, C., Ricci, A., Del Vecchio, L., Di Fazio, A., Agosti, A., Rodolfi, M., Bresciani, L., Mena, P., Guarrasi, V., Bernini, V., Cirlini, M., Ganino, T., & Chiancone, B. (2025). Characterization of bioactive compounds and evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Humulus lupulus (L.) cv. Cascade leaves throughout the growing season. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 4(3), e70091.
Olšovská, J., Boštíková, V., Dušek, M., Jandovská, V., Bogdanová, K., Čermák, P., Boštík, P., Mikyska, A., & Kolář, M. (2016). Humulus lupulus L. (hops)—A valuable source of compounds with bioactive effects for future therapies. Military Medical Science Letters, 85, 19–30.
Possemiers, S., Bolca, S., Grootaert, C., Heyerick, A., Decroos, K., Dhooge, W., De Keukeleire, D., Rabot, S., Verstraete, W., & Van de Wiele, T. (2006). The prenylflavonoid isoxanthohumol from hops (Humulus lupulus L.) is activated into the potent phytoestrogen 8-prenylnaringenin in vitro and in the human intestine. The Journal of Nutrition, 136, 1862–1867.
Roehrer, S., Behr, J., Stork, V., Ramires, M., Médard, G., Frank, O., Kleigrewe, K., Hofmann, T., & Minceva, M. (2018). Xanthohumol C, a minor bioactive hop compound: Production, purification strategies and antimicrobial test. Journal of Chromatography B, 1095, 39–49.
Rutnik, K., Hrnčič, M. K., & Košir, I. J. (2021). Hop essential oil: Chemical composition, extraction, analysis, and applications. Food Reviews International, 1–23.
Rutnik, K., Ocvirk, M., & Košir, I. J. (2022). Changes in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) oil content and composition during long-term storage under different conditions. Foods, 11(19), 3089.
Steenackers, B., De Cooman, L., & De Vos, D. (2015). Chemical transformations of characteristic hop secondary metabolites in relation to beer properties and the brewing process: A review. Food Chemistry, 172, 742–756.
Van Cleemput, M., Cattoor, K., De Bosscher, K., De Keukeleire, D., & Heyerick, A. (2009). Hop (Humulus lupulus)-derived bitter acids as multipotent bioactive compounds. Journal of Natural Products, 72(6), 1220–1230.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matea Kuzmanoska, Tatjana Risteska, Viktorija Maksimova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The intellectual property and copyright on the original content of all scientific contributions in the published paper shall remain with the authors. Authors give permission to the JAPS owner to publish the paper. All authors agree to publish the paper under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
