TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE – MODELS OF PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF FUNCTION
Abstract
The development of traditional architecture of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries forms the basis for the analysis of possibilities, their incorporation into contemporary function and need. The analysis of the existing capacities in the rural tourism creates a direction of a certain development of the capacities on the territory of the state. Presentation of conservation interventions provides a realistic picture of the possibilities of adaptation of residential buildings to fit the contemporary needs of rural tourism. At the same time, through the presented methods, analyzes and guidelines for conservation, a certain valorisation of the values of the buildings with historical traditional characteristics is set, as part of the Balkan heritage. The realization of a certain form of rural tourism synthesizes cultural, natural and social resources as a definite integral model. The process of modern tourism development should encourage the preservation of authentic traditional indigenous architectural values, adapted to the needs of the local population, with a view to preserving the original form of traditional buildings. Development plans at regional level must include projects to implement the traditional residential architecture, thus creating new spatial capacities, while at the same time putting contemporary architecture into function by raising the level of protection of buildings, as part of the region's national cultural heritage.
Keywords: conservation, cultural heritage, rural, ambient.
Downloads
References
Ивановиќ-Баришиќ, М. (2010). Народна архитектура у новој туристичкој понуди, National architecture in the new tourist industry]. In: Стаменковић, С. [editor] Територијални аспекти развоја Србије и суседних земаља. Београд: Универзитет у Београду – Географски факултет, Serbia, pp. 441–446.
Ивковиќ, З. (2005-2006). Заштита и презентација споменика народног неимарства у музеју Старо село у Сирогојну, [Protection andpresentation of folk architecture monuments in theMuseum "Old Village" in Sirogojno]. In: Саопштења, vol. XXXVII–XXXVIII, Београд: Републички завод за заштиту споменика културе, Serbia, pp. 263–266.
Павловиќ, Д. (1981). Народна архитектура у просторном планирању и туризму [Traditionalarchitecture at the National Physical Planning and Tourism]. In Саопштења, vol. ХIII. Београд: Републички завод за заштиту споменика културе, Serbia, pp. 305-308.
Павловић, Д. (1986). Стање заштите и вредновање споменика народне архитектуре у Европи, [Condition assessment and care of monumentsof folk architecture in Europe], Саопштења, vol. XVIII. Београд: Републички завод за заштиту споменика културе, Serbia, pp. 315–320.
Тодоровиќ, М., Павловиќ, С. (2010). Етнопаркови (музеи на отвореном) у функцији развоја туризма и локалног регионалног и националног идентитета [Ethno parks (outdoor museum) inthe development of tourism and the local, regional andnational identities]. In: Стаменковић, С. [editor] Територијални аспекти развоја Србије и суседних земаља. Београд: Универзитет у Београду – Географски факултет, Serbia, pp. 409–416.
Финдрик Р. (2003-2004). Музеји народног градитељства - једно од путева да се сачувају дела народног градитељског умеќа [Museums offolk architecture - one of the ways to preserve thearchitectural skills of national]. In: Саопштења, vol. XXXV-XXXVI. Београд: Републички завод за заштиту споменика културе, Serbia, pp. 311–321.
*
Barton, E.C. (2001). Sites of memory. New York: Princeton Architectural press.
Hillier B. Hanson J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: University press.
Lawson B. (2001). The language of space. Oxford: Architectural press.
Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking architecture, a reader in Cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Pavlović, D., et al. (1987). Narodno graditeljstvona Balkanu, [Traditional architecture in the Balkans], Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture Srbije, Београд: Balkanološki institut Srpske akademije nauka iumetnosti, Društvo konzervatora Srbije, Serbia.
