INTRODUCTION AND DETERMINATION OF NEW TOMATO HYBRIDS

  • Daniela Todevska
  • Sanja Kostadinovic Velickovska
  • Igor Iljovski
  • Biljana Kovacevik
  • Fidanka Ilieva
  • Marjan Crvenkovski

Abstract

The determination of the organoleptic characteristics in tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. is a significant part in the basic needs and requirements of the market, but also in increasing the export potential. The aim of the research is the selection of new red tomato hybrids Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. According to their organoleptic, morphological and sensory characteristics, for possible commercialization. In the research, 23 coded new indeterminate hybrids of red tomato were analyzed and compared with 5 already present commercial hybrids (Brave F1, Adriatik F1, Matissimo F1, Alamina RZ F1, Signora F1). The tomato was produced from seedlings by a registered nursery grower Agro Koni, and it was planted in sheltered areas at a grower in Tirana, R. Albania. The properties that were examined: type of tomato (1 late / 5 early), plant strength (1 weak / 5 strong), length of internodes (1 long / 5 short), fruit quality (1 bad / 5 excellent), size of fruit (1 small/ 5 large), as well as fruit color, fertility potential (yield), as well as overall evaluation of the plants in a rank from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent). The relationships between analyzed properties, descriptive and the variance's analysis provided an insight into those hybrids that satisfy the methodological requirements. Based on the results and determination of new hybrids with improved properties from the existing ones, the needs of the market and consumers are influenced. According to the genetic potential and phenotypic characteristics, 3 new hybrids (TME221276, TME220244 and TME220245) were determined, which satisfied the examined criteria, thus giving the opportunity to be included in the cluster of commercial hybrids on the market.

References

1. Atanassova. B., Georgiev. H. (2006). Expression of heterosis by hybridization. Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crop. Vol.2: Tomatoes; Razdan. M.K., Mattoo. A.K., Eds., CRCPress: BocaRaton,FL,USA, 2006; pp.113–151.
2. Argento. S., Melilli. M.G., Branca. F. (2019). Enhancing Greenhouse Tomato-Crop Productivity by Using Brassica macrocarpa Guss. Leaves for Controlling Root-Knot Nematodes. Agronomy 2019, 9, 820.
3. Bădulescu. A., Popescu. C.F., Dumitru. A.M., Sumedrea. D.I. (2020). New varieties of tomato—Morphological aspects and molecular characterisation with RAPD and SSR markers. Not. Sci. Biol. 2020, 12, 818–828.
4. Bergougnoux. V. (2014). The history of tomato: From domestication to biopharming. Biotech Adv 32 (1): 170-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.11.003;
5. FAO. Faostat. 2020. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 23 November 2021).
6. Felföldi. Z., Ranga. F., Socaci. S.A., Farcas. A., Plazas. M., Sestras. A.F., Vodnar. D.C., Prohens. J., Sestras. R.E. (2021). Physico-Chemical, Nutritional, and Sensory Evaluation of Two New Commercial Tomato Hybrids and Their Parental Lines. Plants 2021, 10, 2480.
7. Fortis Hernandez. M., Antonio-Ordoñez. E., Preciado-Rangel. P., Gallegos-Robles. M.A., Vázquez-Vázquez. C., Reyes-Gonzales. A., Esparza-Rivera. J.R. (2021). Effect of substrates formulated with organic materials on yielding, commercial and phytochemical quality, and benefit-cost ratio of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) produced under greenhouse conditions. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2021, 49, 11999
8. Macholdt. J., Honermeier. B. (2016). Impact of climate change on cultivar choice: Adaptation strategies of farmers and advisors in German cereal production. Agronomy 6 (3): 40. DOI: 10.1177/0030727016650770
9. Mubarok. S., Ezura. H., Qonit. MAH., Prayudha. E., Anas. Suwali S., Kusumiyati. Kurnia D. (2019). Alteration of nutritional and antioxidant level of ethylene receptor tomato mutants, Sletr1-1 and Sletr1-2. Sci Hortic 256: 108546. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108546
10. Oboulbiga EB, Parkouda C, Sawadogo-lingani H, Compaoré EWR, Sakira AK, Traoré AS. 2017. Nutritional composition, physical characteristics and sanitary quality of the tomato variety Mongol F1 from Burkina Faso. Food Nutr Sci 8 (1): 444-455. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2017.8403
11. Lamia Azzi, Cynthia Deluche, , Frédéric Gévaudant , Nathalie Frangne, Frédéric Delmas, Michel Hernould and Christian Chevalie, 2015. Fruit growth-related genes in tomatoJournal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 66, No. 4 pp. 1075–1086, 2015 doi:10.1093/jxb/eru527
12. van Etten J, de Sousa K, Aguilar A, Barrios M, Coto A, Dell’Acqua M, Fadda C, Gebrehawaryat Y, van de Gevel J, Gupta A, Kiros AY, Madriz B, Mathur P, Mengistu DK, Mercado L, Mohammed JN, Paliwal A, Pè ME, Quirós CF, Rosas JC, Sharma N, Singh SS, Solanki IS, Steinke J. 2019. Crop variety management for climate adaptation supported by citizen science. Proc Nat Acad Sci 116 (10): 4194-4199. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1813720116
Published
2024-08-19

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2