DISTANCE LEARNING – DEVELOPMENT, TYPES AND TOOLS
Abstract
What are the key ingredients to learning? What happens when the traditional brick and mortar classroom is no longer an option? Can distance education (DЕ) replace the traditional one? What is distance education compared to online education? The paper answers the posed questions, defining distance education as happening using electronic media, or the Internet, while teachers and students not being at the same place, but working in the comfort of their home. Historically speaking, the roots of distance education can be traced back to the correspondence study as well as to the technological development. When talking about DE, we can differentiate between synchronous and asynchronous, which differ in one component. Synchronous DE is bound by time, implying that students and teachers work simultaneously and interactively. Asynchronous DE is not bound by time, implying that interaction occurs with a time delay. The paper focuses on the advantages and the disadvantages of these two forms of DE. It additionally considers tools such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Google Meet as the most suitable for synchronous DE as well as Moodle, Blackboard and Google Classroom as the most convenient for asynchronous DE.
Keywords: remote education; synchronous; asynchronous; video-conferencing; learning platforms.
Downloads
References
doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1830121
Banas, E. J. & Emory, W. F. (1998). History and Issues of Distance Learning. Public Administration Quarterly, 22 (3) 365-383. doi: 10.2307/40862326
Beatty, B. & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Faculty Perspectives on Moving from Blackboard to the Moodle Learning Management System. TechTrends, 50(4), 36–45.
doi:10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y
Branon, R. F. & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication Tools in Distance Education. Tech Trends 45(1).
Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.). Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/
Clause, F. S. (2001). The assessment of student performance and satisfaction outcomes with synchronous and asynchronous interaction methods in a student -centered distributed learning environment. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 9405.
Chen, B., Sivo, S., Seilhamer, R., Sugar, A., & Mao, J. (2013). User Acceptance of Mobile Technology: A Campus-Wide Implementation of Blackboard’s Mobile™ Learn Application. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(3), 327-343.
doi:10.2190/ec.49.3.c
Cristiano, K. L. & Triana, D. A. (2019). Google classroom as a tool-mediated for learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1161, 012020.
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1161/1/012020
Dela Cruz, J. (2020). History of Distance Education. [online]. [2020-11-5]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/17360954/History_of_Distance_Education
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating Synchronous Online Language Learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1). doi:10.1177/0033688220937235
Lyn, X & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education 15(1).
Matthews, D. (1999). The Origins of Distance Education. T.H.E. Journal 27(2), 56-66.
Mehrabi, J. & Abtahi, M. (2012). Teaching with Moodle in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1320–1324.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.819
Nilles, Y. J. (2002). "Student achievement and satisfaction with asynchronous and synchronous learning in two horticulture courses" Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 20182. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/20182
Oxford Learner’s Dictionary (n.d). Available at:
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com
Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived Usability Evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an Online Learning Platform During COVID-19 using System Usability Scale and Technology Acceptance Model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 105535. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning: A Case Study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8 (1), pp. 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
Rigo F. & Mikus, J (2021). Asynchronous And Synchronous Distance Learning Of English As A Foreign Language. Media Literacy and Academic Research 4(1), 89-106.
Sumner, J. (2000). Serving the System: A critical history of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 15(3), 267–285.
doi:10.1080/713688409
Van Rousselt, R. (2021). Pro Microsoft Teams Development. Springer. Available at: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9781484263631
doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-6364-8
